And if higher Fargo players always beat lower Fargo players, after people get a robust Fargo rating they wouldn't have to play anymore. Just compare Fargo ratings and the higher rated player is the winner.
Exactly. It is equally as unlikely that I would lose 7-1. But that score wouldn’t have been questionedAnd if higher Fargo players always beat lower Fargo players, after people get a robust Fargo rating they wouldn't have to play anymore. Just compare Fargo ratings and the higher rated player is the winner.
You must be the AZ version of the clueless Gen Z with the “bro” thingWell, Noble bro. Clearly my Fargo would have gone up, so how are you like Accusing me of sandbagging? Always looking to argue with somebody bro. You’re the AZ version of a Karen.
counter-bagging. its the newest thing.Am I missing something? If it was submitted that he beat someone two sets, 70 points higher than him, wouldn’t that be the opposite of sandbagging? He’s literally begging to have his Fargo raised… arguably higher than it should be.
He “bro’ed” me first. Hahahaha.You must be the AZ version of the clueless Gen Z with the “bro” thing
Excuse my ignorance but what is Salotto.(sounds like a mob guy)![]()
Basically a hook-up app but instead of getting laid you get played.Ok thank you sir.
I rather get laid instead .
As a hook-up app it stinks. You can only get a game if someone actively puts out a match for you to "discover". It should have some feature where anyone near you can be pinged to play.Basically a hook-up app but instead of getting laid you get played.![]()
It shouldn’t .. I’m pretty new to Fargo. Only play in a league and there are people in my area that are mid 600s that I beat in tournaments plenty but I’m in the mid 500 Fargo lol I only play one match a week your fargo doesn’t move much. Hell I’ve beaten guys 5-0 with about a 500 and my Fargo went downwell thats cause thats what it looks like
beating someone 100 points higher so easily
thats whyIt shouldn’t .. I’m pretty new to Fargo.