Shane Wolford VS Anthony Meglino (Action) $216K

Regarding their fargos, Anthony is a really good one hole player. If he has a lot of one hole matches in the system, it could have skewed his rating a bit higher.

There was another match for 60k where the lower rating won. Thomas Haas 726 vs Julio Burgos 737. They played 4 total sets, 2 9 ball, 2 10 ball, all race to 21. Thomas won 3 decisively, and Julio won one hill-hill. Both players have thousands of robustness.
 
I think they should rate men and women differently, at least when the rate is reaching 700.
From there, all female vs female matches should not have been credited as same as vs male matches.
I know they can figure something out, but except Siming Chen :LOL: (I like to keep the debate going LOL), all other womens fargo is overrated by at least 25 - 50 points, PERIOD.
Well Im glad you're here to set years of math and proof straight. How do the #'s know its a male or female Einstein? This should be good.

If nothing else you're a good troll, love it!
 
Regarding their fargos, Anthony is a really good one hole player. If he has a lot of one hole matches in the system, it could have skewed his rating a bit higher.

There was another match for 60k where the lower rating won. Thomas Haas 726 vs Julio Burgos 737. They played 4 total sets, 2 9 ball, 2 10 ball, all race to 21. Thomas won 3 decisively, and Julio won one hill-hill. Both players have thousands of robustness.
I just can't believe that people don't understand odds 🤷‍♂️

Play enough sets and a 600 is gonna beat an 800, doesn't mean Fargo is wrong, in fact it will probably prove its right
 
I think they should rate men and women differently, at least when the rate is reaching 700.
From there, all female vs female matches should not have been credited as same as vs male matches.
I know they can figure something out, but except Siming Chen :LOL: (I like to keep the debate going LOL), all other womens fargo is overrated by at least 25 - 50 points, PERIOD.
Wow, you've definitely been beaten by a woman on numerous occasions and it shows.
 
Someone in the chat said Wolford bets all of his own money. Which I find hard to believe, unless his family is wealthy or something, or he owns a very successful business. They seemed to know him on a personal level and was very adamant. Betting 125K of your own money when you are not even a top 5-10 player in your own country is ridiculously stupid. He's ranked #19 in the USA. He is the 2nd best Shane though.
It's comments like this that just prove how little you know. I watched a player in Vegas(they live there) beat another guy out of 240k 1pckt before 9am, this is/was a regular game for these guys(they weren't helpless but there was no chance of either of them finishing top 10 at derby) Helfert will know who I'm talking about.

If this were the case, nobody would ever bet a dime on pool.

Do you think millionaires shouldn't be playing for 100k cash and up because theyre not top pros?

Nevermind, I should have my head examined
 
Well Im glad you're here to set years of math and proof straight. How do the #'s know its a male or female Einstein? This should be good.

If nothing else you're a good troll, love it!
All players has an unique ID in Fargo system and that ID knows the players gender and all other info, Einstein can't beat a computer running SQL LOL
 
Wow, you've definitely been beaten by a woman on numerous occasions and it shows.
99% of men will say NO women with the same fargo rate has ever won over me :LOL:
When it comes to 700+ Fargo rate, that's when I think the rating should be adjusted for women, for many many reason. 500 or even 600, I can live with that but I don't think it's fair when it is above 700 range, keep beating other female and become 800 fargo then being beaten by a 700 man badly is what I dont want to see but do want to see for entertainment purposes LOL
 
It's comments like this that just prove how little you know. I watched a player in Vegas(they live there) beat another guy out of 240k 1pckt before 9am, this is/was a regular game for these guys(they weren't helpless but there was no chance of either of them finishing top 10 at derby) Helfert will know who I'm talking about.

If this were the case, nobody would ever bet a dime on pool.

Do you think millionaires shouldn't be playing for 100k cash and up because theyre not top pros?

Nevermind, I should have my head examined
I didn't claim to know anything you moron. I simply stated what someone said in a chat during the Wolford vs. Meglino match.

Your comparison using amateurs betting large amounts of money makes no sense. We are talking about 2 pro's. Wolford is not a millionaire.

You claimed you put me on ignore a few weeks ago but I guess you just can't help yourself to engage with me.

You're a liar and I have nothing more to say to you. Go back to NPR where you belong. You have some weird obsession with me.
 
Last edited:
99% of men will say NO women with the same fargo rate has ever won over me :LOL:
When it comes to 700+ Fargo rate, that's when I think the rating should be adjusted for women, for many many reason. 500 or even 600, I can live with that but I don't think it's fair when it is above 700 range.
What's your Fargo?

Also, why did you go back to like one of my posts from 2015 replying to your very first post on this forum? Thought that was hilarious and strange lol.
 
What's your Fargo?

Also, why did you go back to like one of my posts from 2015 replying to your very first post on this forum? Thought that was hilarious and strange lol.
I don't have fargo but watching 7xx women playing, I should be 699 :LOL:
I just got flooded with scammer emailing me selling cue that I posted on WTB section, so I think my email was posted somewhere here so I went back to remove it, you did like my first ever post huh buddy :LOL: also I wonder what happned to Mike Wong where is he now :LOL: I thought he was very brave and passionate, or people here will call him delusional, very toxic forum LOL
 
I don't have fargo but watching 7xx women playing, I should be 699 :LOL:
I just got flooded with scammer emailing me selling cue that I posted on WTB section, so I think my email was posted somewhere here so I went back to remove it, you did like my first ever post huh buddy :LOL:
Lmao back in the day when we were trying to sponsor Mike Wong to the US Open :ROFLMAO: good times good times.
 
Lmao back in the day when we were trying to sponsor Mike Wong to the US Open :ROFLMAO: good times good times.
WHAT? I don't remember that? That was the guy that ate his ferrule with the chalk, right? I think he was local to me in the early 2000's in the Philly area (or at least came to the Open events there). He took like 10 min per shot. He was in the finals vs Eddie Abraham in a regional event at my local room in Philly, and the TD went home and left the money because he was taking so long. hahaha. How the f was he a candidate for sponsorship? hahaha
 
WHAT? I don't remember that? That was the guy that ate his ferrule with the chalk, right? I think he was local to me in the early 2000's in the Philly area (or at least came to the Open events there). He took like 10 min per shot. He was in the finals vs Eddie Abraham in a regional event at my local room in Philly, and the TD went home and left the money because he was taking so long. hahaha. How the f was he a candidate for sponsorship? hahaha
Yeah he was unbearably slow. I believe he was living in NYC in the 2010's when I was living there and would run into him at Steinway a lot. Never heard of him eating his ferrule though, that is friggin hilarious and gross lmao.
 
It wasn't literal.... he'd chalk it like a complete banger, and basically wear out the entire middle of the ferrule with the chalk. Almost like he ate it! hahaha
Lol my bad, I read that wrong.

Here is the thread in question:

@july9x you were being a meanie :ROFLMAO:

 
Lol my bad, I read that wrong.

Here is the thread in question:

@july9x you were being a meanie :ROFLMAO:

I wasn't kidding, I wanted him to improve 🤣
 
Back
Top