Premier League Pool - Matchroom Pool
matchroompool.com
What the hell is going on?
A really weak list of players.
I know there's 3 wild-cards left, but where the hell is SVB, Gorst, Filler, Chua, Biado and Shaw?
matchroompool.com
No, not "really weak" -- 8 of those 13 named so far have FargoRates in the 800s and the other 5 are in the 790s. But, yes, it would be an even stronger field with one or more of the players you listed.... A really weak list of players.
I know there's 3 wild-cards left, but where the hell is SVB, Gorst, Filler, Chua, Biado and Shaw?
The answer would seem to be that Matchroom has decided to spend its "invitaitonal" money elsewhere.not that weak, given the circumstances. but where is the world pool masters? world cup of pool? of the three events they choose to keep this slugfest, which is really an acquired taste
No doubt, despite the absence of the three biggest names in our sport, this event will be entertaining. It seems near certain that at least one Cinderella (meaning 800 Fargo or less) will reach the last six and probably even the semis. I'll be rooting for the young players here. Perhaps one of them can write a story like that of Neuhausen at last year's PLP.Looks like the 14th and 15th participants have been named now (K. Kaci and Melling), but not yet the 16th. Maybe that will be a youngster on the way up.
Of the named 15, 8 are in FargoRate's top 50 and all the rest in the top 100. So this year's field is probably stronger than the 2023 field, which included Alghamdi, Strickland, Seoa, and Chou.
The answer would seem to be that Matchroom has decided to spend its "invitaitonal" money elsewhere.
WCOP and WPM, neither of which appear on the current WNT schedule, have seemingly been replaced by the Reyes Cup and the Legends event. The Reyes Cup, for two years, has been near unwatchable as petty politics have ensured that Team Asia faces little resistance (Filler excluded in 2024 and 2025, SVB excluded in 2025). The Legends, which features the weakest pool of the year in WNT play, is even more unwatchable. The PLP, once a gathering of the elite, has been watered down to the point that just six of the sixteen entrants are in the Top 50 based on Fargo. While I miss the WPM and the WCOP, I take no issue with Matchroom's decisions on how to spend its money. Let's not overlook that Matchroom is also choosing to spend its money on producing new major events, as they did at the Florida Open and Philippines Open in 2025.
The bottom line here is that Matchroom continues to spend to grow our sport and is to be admired for it.
Agreed. As much a test of stamina as anything else.PLP was always a slugfest. albin almost committed seppuku the first year. i don't see why it would ever be preferred over the WPM.
Note that PLP has been reduced from 8 days in each of its first 5 iterations to 5 days this year. Maybe that will help.PLP was always a slugfest. albin almost committed seppuku the first year. i don't see why it would ever be preferred over the WPM.
Not what I saw. The players put pressure on themselves to perform each time I have watched.PLP always feels like the epitome of an "exhibition". No tension, no pressure, no stakes.
I have mixed views of this event. I would prefer the WPM or WCOP instead. Someone should ask Frazer why WNT prefers this event over the others.The PLP is one of Matchroom’s weakest events in my opinion. The round robin format coupled with the “high” player count results in much of that tournament being played without any sort of stakes.
The field isn't the best, but that's to be expected given the conflict with Vegas.No doubt, despite the absence of the three biggest names in our sport, this event will be entertaining. It seems near certain that at least one Cinderella (meaning 800 Fargo or less) will reach the last six and probably even the semis. I'll be rooting for the young players here. Perhaps one of them can write a story like that of Neuhausen at last year's PLP.