New Dynaspeheres Set

HawaiianEye said:
Hyundais are dependable.

I have one I bought new in 2011 and it is still going and has had no major repairs.

I bought another new one last year.
Click to expand...
I'm just saying this because I ran Auto/Truck shops repair shops for 17 yrs. Drove Volvos for 41 yrs straight, because the Engines Never Wore out. if you changed your oil. If the engine in the car has been around for minimum 5 yrs straight, and used in many different models that's my base line. Like one style Ford engine.... a 4.6 V8, is was produced for 24 yrs straight, that tells me something. Mustangs, Crown Vics, Explorers etc all had this core engine. If the Hynudai has engines that have been in many models for Many yrs, then its a good drivetrain. I just read something on national news about some of the newer Hyundai models where a backyard mechanic is Unable to change their front brake pads unless they buy hardware for a few thousand to do the job. That's not good.
 
Screenshot 2026-03-15 at 6.59.06 AM.png
 
the bronze set and the vanadium which i think is the same but different cue ball. are as good and play as well as any other set ever made.
and both can be still found less than 150 bucks if you search.
 
Island Drive said:
It'll be interesting if they hold up long term in rooms that have allot of play. If they do, like zar said, a game changer for ball maker$.
I've only seen one ball set of centennials wear out in my lifetime, at 38th and Sheridan in Denver.
It was the first room in to have Gold Crown I's and it was the table Danny Medina played on ALLOT.
They also had two 5x10 snooker tables.
Even Omaha Fats hung out there yrs ago.
Click to expand...
They hold up just fine as my set has be used for 4 different league sessions plus regular daily play at 2 different locations.
 
Those Chinese made products have always confused me, they put out like 3 brands with 6 different versions of what looks like the same thing, then a few years later re-do it all with new names, with the product still looking the same with the same build design.
 
trob said:
That doesn’t even make sense but I always said the measle ball plays heavy compared to a red circle but they weigh the same soooo lol
Click to expand...

I think it's the elasticity and hardness of the construction. When the Aramith Tournament set first came out, it was clearly the "heaviest" playing ball set, you had to have a decent stroke to move that cueball around. The measles ball and the other Aramith cue balls were more livelier, even though the weight and size were the same.
 
When you say the heaviest set, how did you determine that other than by hefting the balls?
If you weighed them , was there a insistent average and how does that compare with Aramith
measle cue balls? I know there is a lot of forum members that have weighed different brands.
Nonetheless, I don’t recall much variance in weight of Aramith Tournament or Super Pro and
Brunswick Centennials with any of the Aramith measle cue balls based on the many posts
about pool ball weights. Nonetheless, if the cue ball is not known to you, don’t assume it is
weight matched with the object balls in a pool room tournament. Orig. measle cue balls are OK.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top