I must be master of the game. Whoever dogs the most wins.... Buy me a bone.The object of the game isn't to make balls.
I must be master of the game. Whoever dogs the most wins.... Buy me a bone.The object of the game isn't to make balls.
How would they know if their miss was caused by deflection or just a bad stroke?
I didn't say beginners should use no sidespin though, just that they shouldn't be relying it until they are proficient with the center axis of the ball.
It’s a conundrum because beginners will remain beginners until they start using side spin. How could they possibly know when they’re past the beginner stage if they don’t use side spin?
Try baseball, cards, bike riding, anything but pool or golf.
I played for longer than I'd like to admit before I realised the tangent line is only relevant for stun/stop shots. Also when I was learning I wanted to develop a draw and follow shot, but never occurred to me a stop shot would be something I'd want to practice.Learning the 'tangent line'.
I played for longer than I'd like to admit before I realised the tangent line is only relevant for stun/stop shots.
Isn't it really relevant on every shot? How you hit the cue ball makes it leave the tangent line or not, sooner or later, more or less, but the tangent line is always the reference.
Sorry, i don't get your point. Rolling is natural, but it slides before it rolls. If its sliding on contact with the object ball, you know exactly the path the cue ball will take no matter how fast it is moving. This concept was huge for me when I first learned about it.To me it seems more natural for cue balls to roll rather than slide
Sorry, i don't get your point. Rolling is natural, but it slides before it rolls. If its sliding on contact with the object ball, you know exactly the path the cue ball will take no matter how fast it is moving. This concept was huge for me when I first learned about it.
Yes, the idea of stun shots taking the tangent path is much simpler than knowing the follow angle for each cut angle. The problem is that exact stun -- no follow or draw at the instant of impact -- is much, much harder to achieve under a variety of conditions than having the cue ball rolling smoothly on the cloth. A stun shot played from a foot away needs different spin/speed than from three feet away. For follow, the two shots are nearly identical.Sorry, i don't get your point. Rolling is natural, but it slides before it rolls. If its sliding on contact with the object ball, you know exactly the path the cue ball will take no matter how fast it is moving. This concept was huge for me when I first learned about it.
I never knew SVB was a banger, thanks for the info.It's for bangers. True story.
I am of the opinion that beginners should use spin conservatively until they know where the cue ball is going without spin. Most times we use spin to change the path of the cue ball, if you don't know where the cue ball is headed naturally how do you know you need to change its path or by how much it needs to be changed?? This is from watching guys using spin on shots that the cue ball wont touch a rail thinking they are drastically changing the path of the cue ball with spin. Its the same guys that don't use stun because they don't know how to shoot a stun shot. One of these guys also thought blue cloth meant it was Simonis.It’s a conundrum because beginners will remain beginners until they start using side spin. How could they possibly know when they’re past the beginner stage if they don’t use side spin?