Last year, Josh won the China Open, which is as tough to win as the US Open and he won the prestigious Qatar Open. As for the UK Open, Josh played at his highest level but Kaci played a perfect final against him. In my recap, I noted that Josh had just one attempt to pocket a ball in the last nine racks of that final. After seeing his play at the UK Open, I wasn't surprised when Josh won at both Quatar and China. He also won the World Teams Championship last year. Josh was player of the year on both AZB and in Billiards Digest.All good points, sjm.
Honestly, I can't put my finger on it, but there is something that Filler needs more of. I am just not sure what it is.
Two years ago, I thought his kicking and safety game needed work. He did it. His banking, already good, then became topnotch. Now it's hard to find any flaws in his game.
Maybe I am using big MR or other events too much as a basis to judge him. I look at the recent streak of FSR and wonder why Filler hasn't done the same.
Yes, he was great at the Derby. Being a young man, he showed a lot of stamina. But it wasn't exactly a strong field like a typical MR event or the Premier league. Nor were there the bright TV lights and all the pressure of a big MR production.
Looking at the last 16 months, here are Fillers' results in big MR events:
In 2023, he missed the Premier League of Pool due to a scheduling conflict. He also missed the Hanoi Open. A bit odd.
He got knocked out in the final 16 by Ko Ping Chung in the US Open 10-5.
He got knocked out in the semis of the European Open by Anthon Raga, 11-9.
He got knocked out in the final 32 of the Spanish Open by Emil-Andre Gangflot 10-9.
He got dominated by Eklent Kaci in the UK final 13-4, and I thought Kaci psyched him out a bit with pregame comments. Perhaps that is where the seed was planted in my mind that he needed to get ... something.
World Pool Masters he got knocked out in the first round by Niels Feijin.
World Pool championship he got knocked out by Pagulayan in the final 64.
After being, IMO, the best player in the 2024 Premier league, he went down a bit too easy vs Ko Ping Yi in the semis.
***
Does Filler have the best mental game? I don't think so. His youth has been a big shield on the mental side. As he gets older he will feel the pressure more. I already think he does.
Is he not winning more big titles due to such intense competition? Sure. But again, how does that explain FSR's recent run.
Having kids can certainly change priorities. Im not saying that's the case with sky, as I don't know him, but I'm like you in that he hasn't been showing that "fire" (for lack of a better term). He has his sponsorships, does pretty well on the tour, and seems to make a comfortable living. If he is good with that, more power to him.I don't get the impression that Sky cares much any more. He certainly does not seem to have the work ethic required to be a winner in these fields.
Again, all good points. I suspect your assessment of Filler might be a wee bit more accurate than my own.Last year, Josh won the China Open, which is as tough to win as the US Open and he won the prestigious Qatar Open. As for the UK Open, Josh played at his highest level but Kaci played a perfect final against him. In my recap, I noted that Josh had just one attempt to pocket a ball in the last nine racks of that final. After seeing his play at the UK Open, I wasn't surprised when Josh won at both Quatar and China. He also won the World Teams Championship last year. Josh was player of the year on both AZB and in Billiards Digest.
As you noted, he didn't have a great year at the Matchroom majors, but by my count, he won three majors in 2023: a) the China Open, b) the Qatar Open and c) the World Teams Championship, all three having a deep, super-elite field. He also won all four Euro-tour events he entered.
I don't think it's his work ethic, or he would never have gotten to the level he is... It's the family life man, look at Shaw too... and I can almost guarantee you that neither of them have any issues with it, either. Hashtag Dadlife more power to them both!I don't get the impression that Sky cares much any more. He certainly does not seem to have the work ethic required to be a winner in these fields.
Interesting post. Pool has most definitely not had a Tiger Woods type, a guy who was nearly unbeatable when he had his best game, since the straight pool era. My suspicion is that it will remain that way because the standard right now is so high. Winning at the majors has never been more difficult.Again, all good points. I suspect your assessment of Filler might be a wee bit more accurate than my own.
Still, I can't help but sense we are not getting enough out of him.
I don't buy the argument that we can't see a dominate pool player globally because the competition is so good. We see athletes like that emerge from time to time in all sports, Lebron, Brady, Tiger and Serena are recent examples.
I think Filler could be that dominant player, much like Mosconi, Strickland and SVB at times dominated the U.S. scene.
In every case, it's not merely the skills of the player that allows them to be great. It's the mental superiority they show compared to others. A will to dominance.
Does Filler have that will to dominate? I don't know. If I could combine him and Niels Feijin, I could create an incredible player!
I do seem flashes here and there, though, most recently at the 2023 Mosconi. I want to see more of that. I want to see all-time greatness.
Pool has most definitely not had a Tiger Woods type, a guy who was nearly unbeatable when he had his best game, since the straight pool era.
I am not sure which way I would bet. But I look at another solo sport, tennis, especially men’s tennis. There are a lot of great players now. More than ever. And yet, ever since I began watching in the 1970s, the game has been dominated in each era by just a few players. Bjorg, Connors, McEnroe, Lendl, Agassi, Sampras, Federer, Nadal, Dojokovic.Things are very different today than even five years ago. Now, the game is so global that, based on Fargo, fourteen different countries have a player i
I'm betting against the emergence of a player who can dominate in this new era of pool in which the fields in the majors evidence the greatest growth we've ever seen in pro pool.
Tennis and pool have different skill sets, and in tennis the luck factor is almost non-existent. Not so in pool, and when you add the variance in pocket size, humidity, and the way the balls are breaking on any given day, it's harder for even a Filler to dominate on the level of those tennis players you mention. But even so, the majors tend to be won by one of the same small group of players.I am not sure which way I would bet. But I look at another solo sport, tennis, especially men’s tennis. There are a lot of great players now. More than ever. And yet, ever since I began watching in the 1970s, the game has been dominated in each era by just a few players. Bjorg, Connors, McEnroe, Lendl, Agassi, Sampras, Federer, Nadal, Dojokovic.
Maybe pool if different. Time will tell.
Good point. At the tennis majors, they switch to best of five sets, so the cream rises to the top more easily than in pool. It is very difficult to win three sets out of five against the top few in tennis and only a few are up to the challenge.Tennis is also much longer, with almost every point (15-0,30-0 ) e.t.c being almost equivalent to a pool rack in terms of all the back and forth between players.
If 9 ball was a race to 100 at every round of a tournament it might be more likely.
I don't think it's his work ethic, or he would never have gotten to the level he is... It's the family life man, look at Shaw too... and I can almost guarantee you that neither of them have any issues with it, either. Hashtag Dadlife more power to them both!
That must be why I keep hearing pool needs yet even tighter pockets still. Time to try 3.25" pockets I guess. That way Filler can prove his immortality.Good point. At the tennis majors, they switch to best of five sets, so the cream rises to the top more easily than in pool. It is very difficult to win three sets out of five against the top few in tennis and only a few are up to the challenge.
The pool majors don't play a long race, except in the finals.
Are they Dads, though? Big difference between being married and being married with children. That was what I was implyingbiado, albin, feijen etc are married men too.. i'm leaning more towards work ethic. that said, i think his style of play is well suited for success in the contemporary game, with tough break rules and tight pockets. no reason he couldn't snap off a big one some day
Are they Dads, though? Big difference between being married and being married with children. That was what I was implying
haha that's awesome!I think it's time SVB & Emily settle down and he becomes the Triple HHH of Matchroom.
What a nice couple:
View attachment 750865