Don't refs need to make split second decisions?All the balls need to stop moving
I think is the rule
Don't refs need to make split second decisions?All the balls need to stop moving
I think is the rule
No.Don't refs need to make split second decisions?
Thanks for the kind words. It has been great and you are right, I won't forget it!Could tell you had some jitters but who wouldn’t. It’s an experience you won’t forget. And you still got a bullet left.
If you don’t have fun it’s your own fault.
My motto is “ Am I going to win? No!
Am I going to finish in the money? Probably not!
But can I ruin someone else’s day? (I don’t really mean it)
Absolutely!!
I have seen several players pick up a rolling cue ball. No one bats an eye.All the balls need to stop moving
I think is the rule
Ok. Zgonna say lone, meandering cue ball in the middle of the table - compute in head...No.
They need to be able to make quick racks and tight.
I’m not sure Matchroom refs have ever called it. For sure EPBF and some Asian refs have called it. But I think the WNT refs have not.It has been called in the past
So..., it's complicated. Technically, under the WSR (World Standardized Rules) which Matchroom is using (except for break format, I think), intentionally touching any out of play ball while a game is in progress is unsportsmanlike conduct. An unsportsmanlike foul is penalized as the referee (and maybe tournament management) sees fit. If I were the ref and the object ball did not touch any ball still in play, I would ask the player to please wait for the shot to finish. It's possible that the TD has decided on a specific way to handle this particular USLC.
That's a problem. Again, it depends on the situation. If there was a bad hit, and the cue ball is rolling up to the far rail and is sure to hit nothing, that's one thing. I have seen a player pick up the cue ball while it was rolling after a foul, and it was rolling towards a cluster.I have seen several players pick up a rolling cue ball. No one bats an eye.
He seems to be a minor celebrity in the UK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Goldstein
That's a problem. Again, it depends on the situation. If there was a bad hit, and the cue ball is rolling up to the far rail and is sure to hit nothing, that's one thing. I have seen a player pick up the cue ball while it was rolling after a foul, and it was rolling towards a cluster.
I struggle with this interpretation some. You stated it’s unsportsmanlike conduct to touch balls “out of play”. I know rule 6.17 (b) says it’s unsportsmanlike conduct to change the position of balls “in play”. I always thought you’d interpret balls pocketed to be “out of play”. I was under the impression that the sticking point here is that the referee considers balls pocketed to still be “in play” which I would argue against. But I can’t find where WSR says touching “out of play” balls is unsportsmanlike conduct. Can you provide a citation? I’ve searched.So..., it's complicated. Technically, under the WSR (World Standardized Rules) which Matchroom is using (except for break format, I think), intentionally touching any out of play ball while a game is in progress is unsportsmanlike conduct. An unsportsmanlike foul is penalized as the referee (and maybe tournament management) sees fit. If I were the ref and the object ball did not touch any ball still in play, I would ask the player to please wait for the shot to finish. It's possible that the TD has decided on a specific way to handle this particular USLC.
If your opponent knocks a ball off the table (a foul) and it rolls over to your chair, and you pick it up, that is technically unsportsmanlike conduct. The possible penalties range from nothing to ejection from the tournament and forfeiture of all prizes and ranking points, according to the judgement of the officials. If you were the ref, how would you penalize a player for returning a lofted ball?
The rules used to have a clause explicitly allowing the players to touch out of play balls to help the referee with his duties, but it is not in the current revision.
Thorsten Hohmann comes back from a 6-0 deficit to knock off Kledio Kaci.
He was eligible to request from Matchroom that he represent the USA ever since they had changed their policy for Fedor to only require permanent resident status. So odds are, he’s never made the request.View attachment 842492
Is there a reason why it still shows Hohmann representing Germany (Hohmann became a US citizen a few weeks ago), other than maybe the graphics data for Hohmann has yet to be updated? Does Thorsten choose to still represent Germany? Just wondering.
Rule 6.6 does not specify "in play". The whole situation needs to be clarified.I struggle with this interpretation some. ... Can you provide a citation? I’ve searched.