That's a very well-reasoned and well-presented post.I think Niels is only 6 years older than Shane, but your point is still valid.
I do think Shane is not quite as consistent as he once was, although it’s also true that the general level of competition has increased since his earlier days.
Part of the issue with some older players is whether they can or will still put in the work off the table as much as they once did. This has been noted in snooker where the famed Class of 92 still are top 16 players but have admitted they don’t practice like they used to. They can still hit the high gear but not as often.
In Shane’s case, in his prime be probably hit more balls than any other pool player. I’m sure he still works hard but I’m not sure it’s quite as dedicated. Maybe I’m wrong.
Also, sometimes the game and the format don’t suit him. He’s always extremely frustrated when he can’t put together packages. The Predator rack, ref racking etc mean a lot of dry breaks. You can just see it getting to him - indeed in the match he lost he was up, was playing well and then seemed to get frustrated by the bad racks.
I agree that sustaining the work ethic over a long period is difficult. Today's two greatest players, Filler and Gorst, are about ten years into their lives as full-time touring professionals. Like Shane, they reached superelite status through workaholism. Will they still have the fire ten years from now? Will they still be top ten in the world, or will their skills or motivation decline? We shall see.
I also agree with you that the game may not suit him right now. In his best years, 2010-15, he succeeded by outbreaking everyone and running packages with the 1ball on the spot, four-and-a-half inch pockets, and break from anywhere in the kitchen. His tactical skills were good but not great, but it mattered little because he did not have to use them all that often back in the day. Today's WNT tournaments are not ideal for him, with a very narrow break box, four-inch pockets and 9ball on the spot. These conditions have meant a lot more defense and a lot more grinding, and there are more than a few who do this better than Shane. That's why he has just two wins in the five years of the WNT (actually, WNT year five will end with the Philippines Open later this month). In truth, Shane has stepped up his tactical game in the past few years but is still sometimes at a disadvantage when he has to grind against the most elite.
I'm in no position to confirm or refute the claim that he has been getting some bad racks at key moments but, true or not, it underscores his (and our) perception that he is more reliant on his break than any player of the last fifteen years.
I remain awed by Shane's play, and so what if he's not at the very top of the game anymore? He's still a player to be reckoned with, one nobody much wants to see in their draw. Wishing him well.
Last edited: