It's amazing how Filler hasn't won a US Open since 2019, or a World Championship in 9 Ball since 2018.
He needs to put that right next year.
Winning the Qatar Open does nothing for his legacy, it's a crap event with zero history and zero audience.
Yes, but he has won two China Opens since then (three in total). Not sure how long you have been around pool, but until fairly recently, the China Open may well have been tougher to win than the US Open. He also won the 2022 World Games gold medal, a World Teams Championship gold medal since then, and a World 8ball gold medal since then. The "what have you done for me lately?" argument hardly applies here. Filler is the greatest and most consistent mass-producer of major titles of the current generation of pool players and nobody else is even close.
All that said, I'm sure he wants the most prestigious titles the most, just as you suggest. With a silver and a bronze already, I know how badly he wants a World 10ball title, because he has told me.
Kind of agree with you, though, about the Qatar World Cup. It doesn't have the history of some of the other top events, I also agree that it can be hard to take events having almost no audience seriously, but then you must downgrade the recent Jeddah World 9ball events from consideration, too. A high first prize does not, alone, make a tournament great. Still, the Qatar World Cup is an elite event, about five years old, that always draws a killer field, just as it did this year, and its profile as an event continues to rise. I feel that every major championship adds to a player's legacy but agree that Qatar should not qualify as one of Filler's career highlights.
Since the game went globally viral about a decade ago, we live in a world where the majors have very deep fields (often 256) with dozens capable of winning. That's why nobody other than Josh has won more than one major singles title this year, while Josh has four. For me, a major means an event having an internationally diverse field of at least 96 players with a first prize of at least $25,000. I think it's unrealistic to expect Josh to fill in the gaps of which you take note next year. Also, are these gaps really noteworthy given that he has already won the titles noted and pretty much all of the most prestigious titles?
Filler's great, a living legend, but maybe not quite as great as you seem to believe. He'll continue to be a contender at every major in every discipline, but in this era of the game, in which fields are much deeper than they were even ten years, ago, everybody is beatable and my guess is that nobody will produce a year like Varner '89 or Immonen '09 for a very long time.
Overall, I think you made good points, because some of the majors are more important as legacy-builders than others, and we should not lose sight of this.
However it all pans out, though, it will be fun to watch.