Search results

Double o, you do realize I hope, that cutting beyond B would be close to a 90 degree cut. This whole thing is just another case of you putting forth a theory that you dreamed up and then defending it to the death to assuage your ego. Perhaps you should see a pool shrink.

Clue? There is no clue. I can't believe you don't know that the phrase "don't have a clue " means clueless, ignorant, unaware. Maybe I should have said D players are clueless, as in, they very seldom have any idea what they're doing. Reminds me of someone's posts.

Very good analysis of the difference between levels of players. Similar to my earlier post. D's don't have a clue (miss wildly), C's may or may not have a clue (50/50), B's have a clue and are working on gaining knowledge and refining their skills.

So I guess you didn't write the words highlighted above. Is that what you're claiming? You can't even comprehend your own words much less anyone else's.

Again, your lack of comprehension is astounding. No answer to my contention that D players do not have the knowledge or ability to think or execute at the same level as B players. Instead you've expanded the field to include everyone up to "below shortstop level". Any B or above who...

Another nonsensical post. 1st of all, you'll very seldom, if ever, see B players doing the same things as D players. Lumping them all together and using the word 'constantly' is ridiculous. Throw and speed---those concepts don't apply to D players, they don't have a clue. C players may or may...

No, I don't argue with words. Video that came with the book doesn't work. Got an extra you can send me?

Actually, I have no interest in arguing with you. I haven't been paying much attention to you at all lately. Too busy writing up my book review.

I have to give you credit for one thing. Once you make a nonsensical post and are questioned on it, you're tenacious in replying, denying and re-explaining therefore digging yourself an even bigger hole. I highlighted the most blatant parts so you can do more explaining.

Do beginners ever tend to undercut simple shots? Or is that just not possible. I think intermediate players figured stuff like this out back when they were beginners. If someone reading this undercuts often what should they do? Aim thicker or thinner? After they simply stance. Be nice if you...

Kind of strange they list Dennis Orcullo. Isn't he still banned from the US? They also have Schmidt and Shaw listed right next to each other. I would think it unlikely John will show up.

No but it's a moot point as BA never answered. Probably didn't understand the question

Just asking an instructor a question that's all. Nothing different than what you do quite often I have a reason for asking as I'm sure you do with your questions. Let's just wait and see if anyone has an answer.

No, I'm serious. I've never seen it either. Just wondering if it could be beneficial on some shots. PJ'S still laughing, I don't know why.

PJ and bbb, I don’t understand why you guys are laughing at me. I asked a very important, legitimate question and was scoffed at. I'm not sure we can be friends anymore

How about sliding the bridge hand forward during a stroke. Would that ever be a good thing to do?

Play games all you want but you and everyone else know exactly what I'm talking about. John made those attempts strictly for and by himself. You on the other hand, advertise your event as being open for the best to try. Other than a couple of short attempts by others it's been rather one sided...

So if I'm understanding this correctly you're not going to extend an invitation to the most prolific ball runner of the last 20 years? Or maybe you did and he declined?

That's very nice but when will be seeing John Schmidt be making his attempt.

Welcome to 2024. If you'd played back in the 60's or 70's you'd be a happier man.