You are the one who brought up bowling and golf not me. You’re argument is the one lacking logic not mine.
Having equal chances to compete is the point of playing sports. It’s not a matter of having a chance every game you might not have a chance at ALL for multiple games or the whole set which...
And how does this relate to pool? Who cares who shoots first in golf and bowling when you at least still get a chance to match what your opponent does!
In pool you can’t get out of your chair if the player breaks and runs. Then he gets the chance to do it all over again without any...
I believe your reading comprehension failed you. I said except in bowling you have a chance to match that 300. Why don’t tennis players keep serving if they win? Because it’s not fair to their opponent that’s why!
And the golf example is a terrible one because the other player still has a...
Except in bowling the other player has a chance to match that 300. Pool is the only sport where people want the offense to stay on the field after they score. Personally I don’t get it? In tennis the same player doesn’t get to serve every game if he wins.
These examples have nothing to do with a match between two top pros not being recorded. Instead of Baseth working towards an established rating he will remain an unknown.
It has nothing to do with who won and how much they won by. You have data available to use and your choosing not to use it for some reason. Whether or not these games were being submitted to Fargo had no effect on the outcome!
I guess I don’t understand as we have viable data here that can be confirmed by the match being recorded. What good is the data if we don’t use it? If we only use certain information we will never have accurate ratings.
Filler just played a near perfect set in the semis with his CF shaft! Just goes to show it doesn't matter what they use the cream will always rise to the top.