Search results

I think that if you want to “test the waters” it might be better if you were to post this cue on the main forum with a good set of pics and detailed description that includes full specs and condition report asking the forum members to help you with establishing the real value. Once you...

Bartram should get an honorable mention.

In this most amazing match Little Ko made every ball, that's his 99 to Yapp's 0, winning the semi final 11-0. I think Yapp came to the table just 3 times, might have been 4 if you count the lag. Two of those times he couldn't see the ball to hit. What I saw Ko do in the next to last rack...

jtompilot & FranCrimi: 2 good people carry on... :) 😎

didnt do my homework; can this be seen free or is it a pay view now?

Sounds like a No Foul should have been the ruling according to this somewhat experienced gentleman. 🙂

Oh no, not another Hunter laptop...

With respect I have to disagree where you say "it played out as it should have". If either the ref witnessed the foul herself or both players agreed that there was a foul or the ref was able to access video proof that there was a foul or someone like, for instance, Pat Flemming was there...

If The JV says he was there live and personally witnessed Scott's shirt touch the ball then that's good with me. However, and this is the key, absent a ref or a video replay that can def show the foul or a "trusted witness" saying a foul occurred then the call should have been 'no foul'...

I’m not discounting your version. In fact, I didn’t read this whole thread, so if you said previously that you were there and saw the shirt foul, I will take your word for it.

You’re saying Scott fouled as if any of us here knows for sure whether or not he did. What we do know is that there was a difference of opinions between the two players and in that case and absent a ref or a “trusted witness” the rule says they must assume no foul occurred. It appears that the...

Exactly. Where is an ACLU lawyer when you need one lol

Whitorbital gravititis

I think I can speak for myself and all other fat pool players when I say, BAN THE SHIRT FOUL!!! :mad::love::ROFLMAO:

BRussell posted the following earlier in this thread and the second highlighted section should have prevailed in this situation which would have meant, No Foul. Worth noting imo is the random guy in the audience who said he saw the shirt touch the ball can not be considered a "trusted witness"...

Those would be the Badwill stores. glwys

Cool cue curious was this a goodwill find the photos are marked Goodwill

Dislexic I am. Yes sir, Hair Dildo.

Let's not forget "Dildo Hair" The story attached to this nickname was epic!

You're referring to "Scott The Shot" ;)