Search results

I forgot to put you on ignore. Fortunately I’m capable of fixing my mistake as opposed to you, who will continue on as normal

Your math is as on point as your honesty and common sense

Fixed it for you

I would challenge you to find 1% of his posts that are anything other than idiotic, made up, trolling, or flat out lies

Ok Justdum

USPS hard at work

I think you’ll find you’re looking at this backward. Most good stroking (whether practice or game play) occurs in the dark or dim light. You’re welcome.

Two posts in a row directly contradicting yourself. This time you did it while explaining how you didn’t. It’s amazing.

You even argue with yourself. I guess there’s something to be said for consistency. Remember folks, don’t punish your friends. Just make the kill. 😂

wrong again.

Wrong

She should know better than to wear both black and brown leather. Shameful

Wow that’s beautiful

Not saying he doesn’t gamble and I don’t know his true feelings. I know he has publicly denounced it, which may factor if and when he does.

i don’t doubt anything you said, especially the painting himself into a corner part. I still think the manner in which Tony came across is disgustingly classless. Some people don’t mind it. More power to them

Perhaps you aren’t aware, but he’s made a bit of tournament money since then.

SVB has also publicly made his dislike of gambling clear. One more reason to add to the list of reasons he may not have felt like playing the classless idiot.

Well that’s the most terrifying new fact of the year. I’m done learning for now

Thank you. I did not know if a ball frozen to the rail would be considered “part of the rail”. I could see that going either way.

I did see something nearly happen during league that I realized I did not know the answer to, had it happened. If an object ball or cue ball strike a ball frozen to the rail and no actual contact with the rail occurs, is the shot legal and considered to have hit a rail?