Search results

I don't believe it's Cortland. To my experience, Cortland feels a little soft and absorbent. The color is muted and blended.

Reimbursement for Chargebacks/Disputes: If a buyer successfully disputes a transaction (files a chargeback), PayPal may debit your linked bank account to cover the refund to the buyer

I believe PayPal has the ability to suck the funds out of the account it was sent to.

19 is a weird number. You need at LEAST one more.

If a buddy invited me over to his house to play pool, as soon as I seen this, I'd ask him how far the closest pool room was. I'd drive...and pay the time.

That makes me feel better. I wasn't even considering the purchase if it wasn't slate. :ROFLMAO:

I'm going to send an inquiry to see if that weight is correct. 265k. Does anyone think they'll ever sell one?

Look how much it weighs!

He's not a normal guy. I don't know what his issue is, but he just can't help himself. I've purchased several cases from him and was discussing having him make me another exotic skin case. All of a sudden, for whatever reason, he just decides to screw people over and he doesn't discriminate...

You will never see a glue line on a tasc shaft. In fact, I've never seen a tasc that wasn't built 100% perfect. There are none better.

Just a quick word of warning to the AZ community. Sam screwed me and won't respond to my texts, emails, calls, or eBay messaging. I waited 3 or 4 months. I was actually concerned he had some kind of medical issue or even kicked off, but I had the police perform a wellness check at his house...

Better than losing cash though. It's a free roll.

It wouldn't be for free. Winner would get all the money from the players portion of the streams sold to watch them play. Such a clash would probably bring in a lot of money.

When are we going to see a Gorst / Filler challenge match? I want to see an all-around (9 ball, 10 ball, 14.1 and one pocket). I'd buy that match. And I'd rather not see an inflated, meaningless "in the middle" amount from corporations. How about they play winner-take-all for the proceeds...

Yes, granted, they have an opportunity to make the 9 on the break, but that probability is likely close to the better player / breaker leaving them a quick combo or billiard on the 9 after their break. In short, no help to them.

Agreed. My point was to show that to some extent, that metric (% of the time the breaker wins the rack) can be and is a skewed metric trying to assess the value of the break.

Yep, for example, if I played SVB and he beat me 9-1. The breaker would have won the rack 90% of the time. That data is skewed.

Thanks! One factor Dr. Dave didn't consider that would throw a wrench in his hypothesis: Is it possible we see that edge because, on average, the breaker is the better player? To some extent, that must be true because the winner (i.e. better player) is breaking more often. In other words - of...

Losing control over the table from not potting a ball, scratching, or getting hooked, must outweigh the times they run out or take control with a good safety play. I could see the break being a disadvantage for any top pro that plays methodical, strategic, smart pool. On the other hand...

It looks like it's about 50/50 now. Seems surprising to me...I never would have guessed that. I wonder if the same holds true with all levels of play. Seems like it would.