Search results

I know it's old news but were they playing even on that race to 100? I couldn't remember if Dennis was getting some games or not?

With all of this new action talk regarding Keith, it may be time for him to make his way to Olathe. This might be the occasion for him to play the Real King of the Bartables and finally put all that to rest. Just an observation and opinion...

I don't think talking about matches that happened like 15 years ago is much of a concern.

Rusty C is right. Rusty is right, Jimmy beat James at the ole Chesters back in the late 90's on James' favorite table. The pool hall was called another name that I can't think of but it happened there. Shannon was with all of them and at that time Shannon was off limits. James had no interest...

Actually Mike was a great banker in his prime. He beat several bank pool players in the past. I know for certain he beat Tony Fargo even in banks for the cash. Based on your comments about Mike and other posts you made in the past, brings to me the conclusion that you're pretty hard to impress...

Well, I feel stupid. Still a crappy thing to say

I sense you're still little upset that Lee put you on your @$$. I think your comment above was unnecessary and rude, Darren.

BS!! Corey is supremely overrated. Always has been. He plays good when things are in his favor.

I'm curious. Could you ask Keith what year he played David in Dallas??

He needed the 8 from David. (:

I could see that. I gave Keith props on the 9 foot 9 ball game and the early one pocket days. You know, David didn't make many tournaments in the past. So his overall influence wasn't as big as the guys you mentioned. However, two guys you mentioned, David beat even on the bar table, Earl and...

No one dragged him through the mud. Pool players are not beyond reproach, especially if they say something that one might not agree with and if you're looking to set up a game with as well.

And who might you be? A nobody as well.

The set with the big ball on the bar table--- I like David. The set on the bar table with the small ball-- David. Big cue ball on the 4x8--- a toss. One pocket at that time-- Keith. 9 foot 9 ball-- Keith. 9 foot 10 ball-- David. 10 ball on the bar table-- David. Too bad 10 ball wasn't a big...

You got the 8

Jam lighten up.... I simply expressed the opinion that I think David is an all around better player then Keith. Then and now. I also suggested that we would stake David in a game. No insults were given. That is not a bad thing. Keith mentioned he has no interest in playing. So that is clear...

Yeah David remembers everything. There's no way there was a buzzer on that table. That does sound ridiculous when you think about it. Even to suggest it is ridiculous

I knew David beat Keith bad but 24 ahead is a pretty big lead!! Much more convincing than that one 10 ahead session Keith won. David was always known as a thoroughbred and I think Keith as quarter miler. In the long run David is going to beat guys like Keith. David put too much pressure on...

Ohh and this David can't play on the 9 foot. I remember when he beat Buddy Hall two sets. One on big table and one on the bar table. Additionally, wasn't he one the top American finishers in the IPT??