Search results

Just to keep things simple and not clutter choices with more choices... I've been using this hard option for a couple years and am very happy with them They do require a quality stroke. They do not mushroom. They are 100% consistent.

Confirmed.

I think I'm done with pool, really.

It is my understanding the butts are identical and with respect to the shaft taper, I know the 3c revo is tapered much like a pool cue. I did not like it for 3c billiards.

Honestly, I might argue the gc done by a pro is a more desirable table. I know you enter into dialogue here and I feel you are looking for support for your position, not actual discourse. That's fine. A change might be a pleasant experience for your pool life and imo, how well you play...

Is she an actual hooker?

Table at home IS a luxury, I'll give you that!

I'd think that a more similar pair to compare. Who did your gc? A pro? Stock gcs have horribly inconsistent pocket shapes and that is resolved by mechanics who knows what they're doing. That said, I played on rkc and Mark Gregory done right-tight gold crowns and feel they are still easier...

Have to be nuts to eat that shit!

Are there 750 fargos who can't play their speed on a 9'?

Agreed, simple truth.

96.9% unrelated to the question asked.

It does feel 'bigger', agreed. Having pockets that are cut at proper angle sure is nice ttoo.

I've said it before, it has been a pretty cool trip learning this game from the perspective of a competent pool player. Running out of better players, though there really aren't many guys around here that you expect to put down >1.000 avg, so there's that.

Avenged:

Diamonds have smaller pockets and deeper (slate) shelves. + I've had both in my home.

Of course.