Just curious what 14.1 players here who have had the opportunity to play on both 9-foot and 10-foot tables would estimate the high run equivalency would be between the two tables, with identical sized pockets on both tables?
My estimate from my personal experience would be almost 2-to-1 as tough on the big table, meaning a 50 ball run on the 10-footer is just as hard and impressive as a 100 ball run on a 9-footer, or a 2 rack 28 ball run is as impressive on a 10-footer as a 4 rack 56 ball run on the 9-footer.
Does anyone know offhand the differences in the high run or better yet the average of the top 10 high runs in the DCC straight pool challenge in the years they played it on the 10-foot table as compared to the years they played it on the 9-foot table?
I practice 14.1 on both sized tables in my poolroom, although we've only had the 10-footer for only about 1 year. Both tables have Diamond tour pocket specs. I'm finding it extremely hard to get past 2 racks (28 balls) on the 10-footer, whereas I've had 3-5 rack runs on the 9-footer numerous times.
My estimate from my personal experience would be almost 2-to-1 as tough on the big table, meaning a 50 ball run on the 10-footer is just as hard and impressive as a 100 ball run on a 9-footer, or a 2 rack 28 ball run is as impressive on a 10-footer as a 4 rack 56 ball run on the 9-footer.
Does anyone know offhand the differences in the high run or better yet the average of the top 10 high runs in the DCC straight pool challenge in the years they played it on the 10-foot table as compared to the years they played it on the 9-foot table?
I practice 14.1 on both sized tables in my poolroom, although we've only had the 10-footer for only about 1 year. Both tables have Diamond tour pocket specs. I'm finding it extremely hard to get past 2 racks (28 balls) on the 10-footer, whereas I've had 3-5 rack runs on the 9-footer numerous times.