The "Million Dollar Article" by Jerry Forsyth

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
I found this in an old magazine of 'American Cuest' written our very own Jerry Forsyth.

Jerry and I met during my early tournament career and we've certainly made some "pool history" together through the years. Here's the article that I just typed up for those that want to see his perspective on the 'Million Dollar Challenge' Pocket Billiard Tournament.

The next time you sit down for coffee with Earl Strickland don't even think about picking up the check. Pool created it's first million-dollar man in Earl Thursday, April 11 when he was awarded that amount for accomplishing the seemingly impossible feat of running ten consecutive racks of Nine Ball during tournament competition at the first event on the new PCA Tour. One of the forces behind the event, John McChesney of Texas Express Promotions, put it in perspective with figures from the insurance company that insured the prize.

Their figures show that a professional player will accomplish this feat only once in 7.8 million attempts. A pool player is 8 times fore likely to be struck dead by lightening than to run ten consecutive racks. Betcha Earl goes inside when it rains.

To further expound the difficulty of this, consider that it was accomplished on nine foot Brunswick Gold Crown tables with incredibly tight pockets. Two object balls could not make it past the nose of any corner pocket, and the angle of the side pockets were nearly non-existent. Indeed, it appeared that the side pockets projected almost straight out into the plane of the table.

This was the tough equipment. So Earl not only denied some awesome odds, he did it on stingy tables on the first day of the first tournament at which the million dollar reward was ever offered. We should all hope for nothing more than this boy go bald so we can rub his head for luck.

During an interview afterward Earl said he did not start thinking about having a chance at the million dollars until the sixth rack. "Then things got a little nervy. I sure didn't want to scratch or have the cue ball fly off the table while breaking. When I broke the tenth rack, I had to make a crucial decision. I could have put the one in the side and tried to run out the table, but the balls weren't really laying right for that. I have always been a bit of a go-for guy and I figured I had about a 50% chance at making the table-length one-nine combination shot, so I went for it." He made it, and history at the same time. After a 45-minute break to regain control, he went back to the table and ran yet another rack. So, for the record, he ran eleven consecutive racks.

On top of this, the tournament was a grand success for the new PCA tour group and professional pocket billiards. The field included Strickland, ESPN World Champion CJ Wiley, George San Souci, George Breedlove, Ismael Paez, Roger Griffis, and Mike Massey amid a fine supporting cast of both established and emerging pros. A tip of the 'American Cueist' hat goes to the producers of this event. The spectators were well taken care of here. The normal collection of tables was removed from the host site, CJ's Billiard Palace in Dallas, and six new Gold Crowns installed in their place.

With tiered tournament seating throughout the room, spectators could get great views of several matches simultaneously while a courteous wait staff kept them supplied with excellent food and drink. Those of note attending as spectators were cue-maker Richard Black, Larry Johns, President of McDermott Cues, and former world poker champion Amarillo Slim. A conversation with Mr. Johns displayed his determination to continue the upward spiral of our game's popularity. He is working with promoters to garner additional sponsorship from corporations outside the billiard industry, and his commitment to the McDermott tour appears unwavering. If you need a cue, the sponsorship that McDermott provides, along with the excellent product they produce demands that you look at their cues first. Their continued loyalty to the sport is critical and requires our respect.

The matches were held as scheduled, well organized, and when the balls stopped rolling on Sunday night, CJ Wiley had defeated Earl Strickland to win the $10,000 first prize. Earl took home (in addition to his million), $6500 for second place. Canadian Paul Potier finished a strong third, Max Eberle claimed fourth, while fifth was awarded to Shannon Daulton and Larry Liscotti. On his trip to the finals Mr. Strickland took out some formidable players including Bobby Hunter, Paul Potier, and even sending eventual winner CJ Wiley to the losers side with an 11-9 nail-biter. For his part, CJ showed his grit by putting away the likes of Roger Griffis, Mike Massey, Ismael Paez, and Shannon Dalton before being cast out of the winners side by the sharp-shooting Strickland to take on Mr. Potier.

The best match of the tournament may have been this match-up between Potier and Wiley. Paul shot well and smart, building up a huge lead of 10-4 in this race to 11. In control of the table on what would have been the final game of the match, Paul missed a 6-ball and CJ took over the table. He shot flawlessly and won the next seven games in a row to win the set 11-10! This gave the honor of meeting Earl in the finals to CJ, and he came into the set determined to make up for the earlier loss.

The final match see-sawed for the first seven games, staying close with neither cueist running away from the other. Then CJ got hot and built his lead to 10-5 and with a fairly easy cut on the nine to take the win. Inexplicably, CJ missed the shot and gave Earl the table. With thoughts of his own earlier come-back against Potier torturing him, CJ sat and watched Earl slam a long-rail bank in on the nine to claim the game and the right to break. But another come-back was not meant to be, and the local hero CJ Wiley claimed the next game and the tournament win. With his earlier win in Las Angeles added to this one, CJ now carries a lot of momentum forward into the rest of the year.

Of note, the McDermott Tour will act as a feeder group to the PCA pro tour. The winner of each McDermott stop gets free entry into the next PCA event. This nurturing of the player base should help bring new faces into play and help structure pool in much the same manner that golf has already found to be successful. 'American Cuest' wishes the new tour every success and hopes that it will avoid the clash of egos that has doomed so many of it's predecessors.

- Jerry Forsyth, American Cuest staff writer
 
Last edited:

rrick33

Rick
Silver Member
Not to take anything away from Earls accomplishments but, I've often had concerns about the way the odds were calculated on this challenge.

Were the balls racked in the same order for each break? If so this would greatly decrease the odds since the lay out of the table could be very predictable and lack the random element to drive the odds so high.

If the Insurance Co. calculating the odds was unaware of this idiosyncrasy, that could play a factor.

Did they have the same person racking the balls each time? Also a predictable aspect that can influence the odds......especially if key balls were consistently in identical locations within the rack by virtue of the racker's habits.

Also, does anyone know how many of the racks were completed by pocketing the 9 ball early?
As is the case with a predictable rack, an early nine ball would also be a much higher event.

And how many 9 balls were pocketed on the break?
This would take us back to the bad habits of the person racking the balls and further reduce the odds since their would be a much higher level of predictability in a rack that consistently leaves a small gaps due to poor racking techniques.

This was evidenced by a group of people who despite the odds of winning at roulette took a casino to the cleaners by simply watching a wheel for several days and identifying its biases. Since then all casinos calibrate their wheels daily.

I have a strong suspicion that Earls accomplishment may fall into this category.
 

wahcheck

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
very nice

Thanks for posting this, CJ...

I guess at that time, no one knew the insurance co. would try to weasel out of it; but I'm glad it got settled and Earl got something for it...

I seem to recall that you gave Earl the first installment of $50K, and that was both gracious and classy of you....

I hadn't known that the feat was accomplished on super tight tables....
that just makes it all the more phenomenal.....especially on the last 9-ball
combo to win the million....

Still waiting for your CD chronicling the event..........
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
listening to Max Eberle's interview at this moment and was listening to Jay Helfert

Thanks for posting this, CJ...

I guess at that time, no one knew the insurance co. would try to weasel out of it; but I'm glad it got settled and Earl got something for it...

I seem to recall that you gave Earl the first installment of $50K, and that was both gracious and classy of you....

I hadn't known that the feat was accomplished on super tight tables....
that just makes it all the more phenomenal.....especially on the last 9-ball
combo to win the million....

Still waiting for your CD chronicling the event..........


Yes, the tables were "triple shimmed" by a gentleman named David Danzinger and they were extremely tight, the opening was under 4.5 and the shelf was reasonable deep as well.

I had these tables in my pool room and anyone that played there will testify that they were some of the tightest tables in the country. Hard Times in Bellflower had tables that were comparable.

We were trying to prevent anyone from doing this incredible feat and Earl did it anyway. It really messed up our year's schedule of 12 events (all televised) and we ended up doing three more and had to "throw in the towel".....between the legal issues and giving Earl the $50,000 it tapped my $100,000 budget that I had put aside to run the tour.

The documentary will explain the story in detail, we're listening to Max Eberle's interview at this very moment and was listening to Jay Helfert earlier. They both did a great job describing their perspective and Jay was actually the head ref, racking the balls for Earl.
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
"where there's a will, there's always a way"......and such is life.

Not to take anything away from Earls accomplishments but, I've often had concerns about the way the odds were calculated on this challenge.

Were the balls racked in the same order for each break? If so this would greatly decrease the odds since the lay out of the table could be very predictable and lack the random element to drive the odds so high.

If the Insurance Co. calculating the odds was unaware of this idiosyncrasy, that could play a factor.

Did they have the same person racking the balls each time? Also a predictable aspect that can influence the odds......especially if key balls were consistently in identical locations within the rack by virtue of the racker's habits.

Also, does anyone know how many of the racks were completed by pocketing the 9 ball early?
As is the case with a predictable rack, an early nine ball would also be a much higher event.

And how many 9 balls were pocketed on the break?
This would take us back to the bad habits of the person racking the balls and further reduce the odds since their would be a much higher level of predictability in a rack that consistently leaves a small gaps due to poor racking techniques.

This was evidenced by a group of people who despite the odds of winning at roulette took a casino to the cleaners by simply watching a wheel for several days and identifying its biases. Since then all casinos calibrate their wheels daily.

I have a strong suspicion that Earls accomplishment may fall into this category.


The only thing they didn't take into account is there was one human pool player on this planet that could actually "rise to the occasion"......their odds were accurate, they were calculated by a statistician at SMU University here in Dallas. No one has run 11 straight racks in a professional tournament before Earl did it or after.....so the odds are correct.

No one else in the history of the sport could have done what Earl did on that day......it was "almost" impossible....of course my definition of "impossible" changed from that day forward.....now I know for sure anything's possible....and it is, - "where there's a will, there's always a way"......and such is life.
 

Petros Andrikop

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I heard once that Francisco Bustamante ran 3 consecutive sets of 7 in 9ball while gambling in Germany back in the '90s.
Any German players could possibly add something about this..
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
Johnny Archer ran 15 on Fransisco Bustemante gambling as well..

I heard once that Francisco Bustamante ran 3 consecutive sets of 7 in 9ball while gambling in Germany back in the '90s.
Any German players could possibly add something about this..

Yes, and Johnny Archer ran 15 on Fransisco Bustemante gambling as well... When it comes to gambling matches I believe it's been done on several occasions, although that's a completely different scenario.

When gambling the player has many opportunities, it's much more difficult when you just have one race to do it in. Is still takes a lot of talent to run over 9 racks that's for certain.
 

bountybuddy

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
T take my hat off to Earl Strickland. I watched him play live once at the Ohio Glass City Open. One of my best pool memories. If I could I would hire Earl Strickland for pool lessons in a heart beat. He is truly one of the greatest pool players that ever played the game. Shoot well my friends.
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
"what the mind can conceive, the body can achieve" - this is certainly true with Earl

T take my hat off to Earl Strickland. I watched him play live once at the Ohio Glass City Open. One of my best pool memories. If I could I would hire Earl Strickland for pool lessons in a heart beat. He is truly one of the greatest pool players that ever played the game. Shoot well my friends.

Earl, in many ways is in a class all by himself. I've had the opportunity to play him many times in my career, he's always challenging to beat, you have to perform your best to make sure he feels the pressure or he may win from anywhere.

I played him one time at the US OPEN and ran the first 7 racks, then ran 3 behind that and had him 10/0.....he ran 3 racks back and I could tell "He Might Beat Me!!!".....and I was actually worried, even with that much of a lead....I managed to calm myself and play smart to win that last game, but he was determined to come back and win.....and "what the mind can conceive, the body can achieve".....this is certainly true with Earl Strickland.
 

Siz

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Can someone explain to me how anyone could have come up with odds of 7.8 million to one?
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
it was like getting hit by lightning 8 times

Can someone explain to me how anyone could have come up with odds of 7.8 million to one?

The insurance carrier used a Professor of Statistics at SMU University. His conclusion was accurate according to Earl, it had been nearly 8 Million games since he had last ran 10 racks.

No one has done it before Earl did it and no one has done it since. I doubt if it ever happens again, it was a "one time only" type situation. Like Jerry wrote in the first post, it was like getting hit by lightning 8 times.....and advised Earl not to go out in the rain anytime soon. :D That's funny, I don't care who you are.
 

Siz

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
The insurance carrier used a Professor of Statistics at SMU University. His conclusion was accurate according to Earl, it had been nearly 8 Million games since he had last ran 10 racks.

:lmao:

Very good!
 

Sloppy Pockets

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
The insurance carrier used a Professor of Statistics at SMU University. His conclusion was accurate according to Earl, it had been nearly 8 Million games since he had last ran 10 racks.

No one has done it before Earl did it and no one has done it since. I doubt if it ever happens again, it was a "one time only" type situation. Like Jerry wrote in the first post, it was like getting hit by lightning 8 times.....and advised Earl not to go out in the rain anytime soon. :D That's funny, I don't care who you are.

Looks like you guys got over on the insurance company, because there is no way that is an accurate figure on the odds of that happening. I don't know how any pool players could make a dime gambling with such a lack of understanding of basic probability.

If the statisticians were given average B&R stats for several tourneys, they could use those stats to determine the chances of ONE guy with ONE TRY ONLY running ten racks in a row. If the probability of a random player breaking and running a single rack was only .205, then yes, the chances of him being given only one try and having him succeed at running ten in a row are 1/(.205^10) to 1, or 7,628,890 to 1. Sounds good, right?

But there's a fly in that ointment.

There were hundreds of matches occurring that week (maybe you can tell me exactly how many?), with each match having two guys both capable of breaking and running a rack out at any time.

Take, for example, a full field at the U.S. 9-Ball Open. In the first round alone there are 256 players who have a chance at running 10 racks. To get a single success after 256 individual attempts, the chances have increased tremendously.

Now, take the original probability (.205) and ask yourself how accurately that number reflects the best players in the field. If you look at the B&R stats from the 2012 Open streaming table, you can see that on the final day the B&R percentage was 43%. That's not all that much worse than a coin flip. The odds of flipping a coin ten times in a single attempt and having it come up heads ten times is 1 in 2^10, or 1024 to 1. The odds of one guy with a 43% B&R average having only one attempt at running ten in a row are 1/(.43^10) to 1, which is......


4,627 to 1, not hardly 8 million to 1.


;)
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
prize indemnity insurance

Looks like you guys got over on the insurance company, because there is no way that is an accurate figure on the odds of that happening.

They do this type thing for a living, so thanks, if we got over on them we are brilliant. ;)

The odds didn't effect anything except the premium. It was much like a "hole in one" in golf ***......the odds were much higher than a hole in one though......they came up with the 7.8 Million to 1, it made no difference to us what the odds were.......I figured since it had never been done in history the odds would be fairly high......and to my knowledge Earl did something that's still never been done.

***
In addition to hole-in-one insurance for golf events, prize indemnity insurance companies typically offer coverages for other types of contests as well. For example, contest coverage can frequently be purchased for contests such as half-court shots in basketball, field-goal kicks in football, home runs in baseball, blue-line goals in hockey and even retail & casino-based promotions as well.
For example, in the 2005 Super Bowl, prizes were set to be awarded for several events, including a return of the opening kickoff for a touchdown, a safety, and a fourth-quarter field goal of 50 yards or more. Prize indemnity insurance was purchased to cover all these events. However, none of the events occurred in the game.[3]
Most television game shows pay for prize indemnity insurance for million-dollar prizes. In 2008, such an insurance provider demanded RTL Group and CBS toughen million dollar win provisions after The Price Is Right $1,000,000 Spectacular produced three millionaires in the six episodes produced that season under the new rules imposed for the season that changed the format from the bonus spin on the Showcase Showdown wheel to one random pricing game with tougher win conditions and the results of the show-ending Showcase round. The company demanded that the threshold for the $1,000,000 prize be reduced to a winning bid within $500 of the actual retail price of the final showcase (it had previously been set at $1,000 for those six episodes; the daytime double showcase standard is $250 for the typically $22,000 showcases; primetime showcases ranged from $40,000 to $100,000) and the removal of one of the million-dollar pricing games in which a contestant had won the top prize. Furthermore, after the four episodes aired with the new rules, RTL and CBS have not produced any further "million dollar" episodes in the five years since, possibly due to the insurance concerns (the specials had run every year from 2002 up until that point; it should be noted the 2008 series was produced as replacement programming after the Writers Guild of America went on strike and as a way to introduce Drew Carey as the show's host (he had replaced Bob Barker, who had hosted the previous 35 seasons) to a wider audience. A "Big Money Week" with six-figure prizes aired on the daytime version in April 2013,[1] and prime-time episodes have aired sporadically since then, but using the daytime budget.
 

Sloppy Pockets

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
They do this type thing for a living, so thanks, if we got over on them we are brilliant. ;)

The odds didn't effect anything except the premium. It was much like a "hole in one" in golf ***......the odds were much higher than a hole in one though......they came up with the 7.8 Million to 1, it made no difference to us what the odds were.......I figured since it had never been done in history the odds would be fairly high......

Hey, I'm not trying to diminish Earl's accomplishment in any way. He's my favorite player of all time, and it's largely because of his mind-boggling ability to focus when others might melt in the face of such pressure. All I'm saying is the actual odds of what occurred happening again in the same circumstances are easy enough for any college level statistics student to figure, and they ain't 8 million to one. Especially for Earl in his prime.

Now, lock SVB up in his basement and tell him he can't come out until he B&Rs 10 racks in a row and tell him there a million clams waiting for him when he does, and I'll bet you'll be unlocking the door before the week is out.
 

Chip Roberson

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Bill Lawson in the early 80's came back from the losers side in a tourny in Ronoake Va and beat Allen Hopkins 9 to 1 then in the second set for the match--Lawson won the lag and the brake--he ran the sesation out--only 9 though--Billy Johnson--didn't he do something simalar to Buddy hall in the mid 80's in the Star Dust Open? Earl did one of the greatest feats ever in pool win he accomplised this run out--but there were others that may have had the same before him--not on as tight as tables as you have discribed--but we don't really know that either--but in each case with Lawson and Mr. Johnson--both of their runs were stoped because the had met their need for the match
 
Last edited:

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
The odds are the odds....it's like the lottery and he happened to win

Now, lock SVB up in his basement and tell him he can't come out until he B&Rs 10 racks in a row and tell him there a million clams waiting for him when he does, and I'll bet you'll be unlocking the door before the week is out.

This isn't the same thing, it has to be in a tourmament match, and as far as I know Shane has never ran close to 10 in a Professional Tournament match.

The odds are the odds....it's like the lottery, the odds doing change because someone happens to win.....it is what it is.

I'm not sure why you even want to argue what the odds were, it had never been done before and it's never been done since.........if Earl hadn't done it the odds would have been simply "impossible".......and it nearly was.....nearly........I still can't believe he did it. :scratchhead:
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
Bob Vanover ran 9 in the Texas State tournament on 8' tables with giant pockets.

Bill Lawson in the early 80's came back from the losers side in a tourny in Ronoake Va and beat Allen Hopkins 9 to 1 then in the second set for the match--Lawson won the lag and the brake--he ran the sesation out--only 9 though--Billy Johnson--didn't he do something simalar to Buddy hall in the mid 80's in the Star Dust Open? Earl did one of the greatest feats ever in pool win he accomplised this run out--but there were others that may have had the same before him--not on as tight as tables as you have discribed--but we don't really know that either--but in each case with Lawson and Mr. Johnson--both of their runs were stoped because the had met their need for the match

Yeah, I think Bob Vanover ran 9 in the Texas State tournament on 8' tables with giant pockets (there's a huge difference between 9 and 11). Remember, Earl did it on triple shimmed pockets on a Gold Crown table. It's the same one I have in my house, although I made the pockets slightly larger when I re did the rails.

My pockets are still under 4.5 at the opening and go back to just over 4" at the back of the pocket......they are extremely tight, you can ask anyone that I give private lessons to.
 

CJ Wiley

ESPN WORLD OPEN CHAMPION
Gold Member
Silver Member
article for the 'AMERICAN CUEST'

We are putting the "finishing touches" of post production of the Million Dollar Challenge Documentary and came across this article for the 'AMERICAN CUEST' - This brings back many memories and also mentions everyone that played that historic week when Earl won the Million Dollar Challenge running 11 Racks in a row - written by JIM WEST:

The First event of the PCA tour proved to be a resounding success, drawing 40 players from around the US, Mexico and Canada, providing some fine matches and making history in more ways than one.

Wednesday night started off with a VIP/media party to honor the tournament and benefit (former Dallas Cowboy) Tony Hill's 4th Annual Texas Shootout for AMC cancer research. The player's meeting followed then the player's draw was held by tournament directors Jay Helfert of Championship Billiards, and John McChesney and Robin Adair of Texas Express Promotions Group. Top seeds Earl Strickland and Cj Wiley were placed at the top and bottom of the chart (no byes). Play began on Thursday morning at 11. At 8 pm that evening Earl Strickland matched up against Nick Maninno and he started out by running the first 5 racks. Bet out your cameras folks, it's show time! It became apparent that Earl had a shot at the $1,000,000 so the officials were called out and the cameras started rolling. Earl ran game 6,7,9 on the break in game 8, ran game 9, but on game 10 he was left after the break with a tough table length combination with the cue ball at one end near the pocket, the one ball near the side pocket about 10" from the same rail and the 9 about 3" from the pocket on the other end of the table. What to do, what to do, back cut the cobo or go for the run out. Earl cranked up and went for the combo and BAM!, the rest as they say, is history. The crowd went wild and after about 30 minutes of celebrating the match continued with Earl running yet another rack. The odds of that happening are about 7.8 million to 1. Strickland later said that's about how many racks he's shot since he ran 10 in a row once before, 16 years ago.

This tournament was blessed with a lot of fine, tight matches and a lot of great players, known and heretofore unknown, that wil be remembered for a long time. It seems that many of the players featured in the recent book 'Playing Off the Rail' were in attendance either in the tournament or on the sidelines, including the subject of the book Tony Annigoni as well as Amarillo Slim, Jimmy Fusco, Ginky San Souci, Jose Parica, Ismael (Morro) Paez. The atmosphere was very upbeat, even among the losers as the excitement of being in the first PCA tourney and the changes that it will bring were the order of the day among the players. Can congenial and Earl Strickland be used in the same sentence? Yes.

There were some new innovations introduced by the PCA such as a dress code, scratch on the 9-ball (last remaining object ball) opponent has ball-in-hand behind the head string and last but not least, players break their own rack.

There were plenty of close contests to give the crowd it's money's worth all the way up to the finals. On young man, Max Eberle, 23, brought his fine strategic moves all the way from Arlington, VA to finish fourth, while wearing a tux no less, until Paul Potier finally stopped him. Paul in turn, played CJ Wiley to the hill when he missed a cut on the 6-ball and that was all she wrote with CJ taking the match to face the navo riche Earl Strickland in the final match. This may have been the least exciting match (unless you were CJ) as Strickland could never quite put it together , missing an easy (for Strickland) cut shot and making a couple of scratches giving CJ the chance to put on a fine, exhibition of shooting and run away 11-6 for the first PCA title.

RESULTS

1st CJ WIley
2nd Earl Strickland
3rd Paul Potier
4th Max Eberle
5th-6th Shannon Dalton and Larry Liscotti
7th-8th Bobby Hunter and Ismael Paez
9th-12th Glen Atwell, Danny Harriman, Jimmy Fusco, and Jose Parica
13th-16th Mike Gulyasy, Mike Massey, George Breedlove, and Marco Marquez
17th-24th Dave Favor, Tony Annigoni, Buddy Dennis, Smokey Bartlett, Ben Tubbs, George San Souci, Mark Jarvis, Randy Jones
25th-32 Nick Mannino, Dennis Coulter, Scotty Townsend, Bill Meacham, Billy Weir, Bobby Moorefield, David Pierson, Roger Griffis
33-40 Bill Harper, Jim McDermott, Calvin Harcrow, Tommy Dilorenzo, Steve Smith, Martin Shulte, George Michaels, and Tang Ho.

Total Purse $41,000 with $25,000 added
 
Top