The main difference from the way it was played at the SBE is that at the SBE the table could be given back after ANY miss.
I really, really like this rule. It's another measure to eliminate luck. Someone misses and hooks you by accident - why should you be punished for their screw up? Everything in the game should be the result of an intended act (as much as possible at least). Incoming player should have option to play it or give it back. Should never have to accept an inning from the opponent unless safe was called. Which all safeties should be called.
Only downside, and I think it is very insignificant to the bigger picture, is that it will put an end to the two-way shot. But I think that is a very small price to pay for cleaning up the game tremendously.
I would be very disappointed if 10-ball settled into nothing more than Texas Express style 10 ball, basically 9-ball with an extra ball. If that happens, then that is a giant failure of the pool world to usher in the next step in the evolution of a main tournament game ie, test of skill.
While the WPA and others have 10-ball rules, I still feel 10-ball's rules are unsettled and still in the development stage. For the most part, 9-ball's rules were the same everywhere as Texas Express became Gospel. Only with some procedural differences such as breaking rules and racking rules. 10-ball rules are not standardized across the board yet, and WPA doesn't rule over the pool world because they appointed themselves king.
Hopefully the idiots don't win the day and 10-ball becomes 9-ball with one more ball.