groups 6 and 1 have lost their luster, imo, with the bad showing of robles and archer.
group 4 is all about souquet, sigel, and lee. this is the only group of the bunch with such a clear distinction between the cream and the crumb. the bottom 5 have shown absolutely ZIPPO against the top 3.
group 3 is the most fascinating to me. for obvious reasons,,,just look at the top four.
why is everyone taking such an insouscant attitude about mataya's cr@p,,,making group 7 the one i care least about.
i'm glad sigel and max are showing well. with archer and robles not having faired well, at least these two make the finals less cut and dried.
group 4 is all about souquet, sigel, and lee. this is the only group of the bunch with such a clear distinction between the cream and the crumb. the bottom 5 have shown absolutely ZIPPO against the top 3.
group 3 is the most fascinating to me. for obvious reasons,,,just look at the top four.
why is everyone taking such an insouscant attitude about mataya's cr@p,,,making group 7 the one i care least about.
i'm glad sigel and max are showing well. with archer and robles not having faired well, at least these two make the finals less cut and dried.
Last edited: