1948 Eight-ball Rules

bell

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Can anyone point me to a site where I can see the old rules for 1-15 Eight-ball?
 
LOL I was looking at some of my old books and in the 8 Ball rules it said if you make the 8 on break you Lose!!!!!!!!:eek:
 
Thank You

Thank You so much. What a huge repository of pool knowlege lurks herein.

Thanks Again!!

An old fart who plays in local Sr. Citizen Center. (Hey, there are a lot of us).
 
bell said:
... An old fart who plays in local Sr. Citizen Center. (Hey, there are a lot of us).
The last time I played 1 and 15 was in a similar situation. One thing (of several) that is not perfectly clear in the rules, is that if you pocket the 1 (or 15) in the wrong pocket, you get to shoot again after the ball spots. This means that a good player might shoot the 1 ball five or six times in a row, trying to move balls out of the path to the side pocket with the cue ball.

There is a similar wrinkle in some local snooker rules. The "wild pink" rule allows you to shoot at the pink any time you want for 6 points, whether you have sunk a red or not, but if you miss it when shooting it out of turn, you lose 6 points. Of course this is a hustler's game, and good players might pocket the pink 20 or 30 times in a row.
 
Bob Jewett said:
There is a similar wrinkle in some local snooker rules. The "wild pink" rule allows you to shoot at the pink any time you want for 6 points, whether you have sunk a red or not, but if you miss it when shooting it out of turn, you lose 6 points. Of course this is a hustler's game, and good players might pocket the pink 20 or 30 times in a row.
Sounds like a variation on 'Volunteer Snooker' Bob. This was an official game appearing in the old B&SCC rulebook of billiards and snooker, but little heard of now. Basically the same as snooker but after potting a red the first colour was a 'free' ball - ie no penalty if you missed. Thereafter you could volunteer to pot colours as penalty balls - you lost the value if you missed - or take a free red like normal snooker. Big scores could be had, and no matter how far behind you could always theoretically win.

Boro Nut
 
Boro Nut said:
... Thereafter you could volunteer to pot colours as penalty balls - you lost the value if you missed - or take a free red like normal snooker. Big scores could be had, and no matter how far behind you could always theoretically win. ...
So since I've potted a ball from the black (billiard) spot 28 consecutive times, I have done the equivalent of a 189-point break at snooker? Someone call Guinness.

Did the option at volunteer snooker end when you were on the colors?
 
Bob Jewett said:
So since I've potted a ball from the black (billiard) spot 28 consecutive times, I have done the equivalent of a 189-point break at snooker?
Wouldn't you have received a point for the red as well, making it 190?

Doc
 
gulfportdoc said:
Wouldn't you have received a point for the red as well, making it 190?

Doc
Well, since all of the balls were red, I suppose it would only be 183. The actual record for this sort of shot was set by William Peall who pocketed 721 consecutive balls off the (black) spot on a 6x12 table. Whether you count this as better than 526 balls on a 4x8 pool table may depend on which side of the pond you live on.
 
Bob Jewett said:
Did the option at volunteer snooker end when you were on the colors?
No, the next ball on is always free, but once potted any other colour(s) can be volunteered out of sequence. I think there was a limit of three consecutive times that a colour could be potted before it stayed off the table for one shot, forcing you to go for a different colour, but you still have unlimited scoring potential with only blue pink and black left (after potting brown) ie volunteering the pink and black.

Boro Nut
 
Last edited:
Bob Jewett said:
Well, since all of the balls were red, I suppose it would only be 183. The actual record for this sort of shot was set by William Peall who pocketed 721 consecutive balls off the (black) spot on a 6x12 table. Whether you count this as better than 526 balls on a 4x8 pool table may depend on which side of the pond you live on.
While 100 pots off the spot is no easy task I think 721 speaks more of mental endurance than skill. If I was ever good enough to do 300 I'd still probably offer the other bloke a draw if he would just let me go home.

Boro Nut
 
Last edited:
Pink ball wild

Once back when I was young and in condition, playing pink ball wild, I shot 100 pink balls in a row...just to see if I could do it. Very boring...
I am sure many could do it, but who would want to ?????
 
Back
Top