PocketPoint:
We're seeing a stream of these "what if" threads where you purport an "innocent," "hypothetical" situation that obviously details a situation to either thwart the rules, weasel another shot at the table or a [cheap] win, or else a way to shark your opponent.
You must think it's "cute" to come up with these inane attempts at loopholing through the official rules or sharking your opponent. You must think it's cute to do something like intentionally and maliciously fill a pocket with your own category of balls, slam the cue ball into that overflowing pocket knowing that it'd rebound back onto the table, and "think" you're leveraging the excuse that "you hit your own ball -- it's a legal shot." You might think it's "ingenious" and "creative." You might even think that the fact it bothers many on here reading your thread that you've demonstrated "Exhibit A" of its "effective sharking technique." But it's nothing more than superficial cheating under the guise of "abiding by the rule book." I don't think even roughhouse bar pool stoops that low. You try that up here in NY, and in some places, you may not make it out of the place alive. Feh, forget about NY -- try that *anywhere* and I guarantee you Very Bad Results(TM).
Forget the hints of physical violence that other posters alluded to; you might be a candidate for jarring if you continue down this road. Scopolamine in your drink does wonders to "turn the tables" on a guy that thinks like you. Don't say you haven't been warned by the numerous replies you've gotten so far, an indicator that this type of thinking is the wrong road.
-Sean