I've got mixed feelings about this. What everyone has posted about being conservative is great advice and it's how I used to play bad players. I've changed a little bit though.
When you are playing conservative and playing safe and then making balls and playing safe, you really can't make mistakes and you put a lot of pressure on yourself. Any mistake you make gives them a free shot. And there isn't any difference in how you play when there is slack - early in the rack - and when there isn't - later in the rack or with the 9 ball in an easy spot for a combo.
this is exactly it. i'm hoping that you're a player who's accustomed to winning pretty. and that you're rating stems moreso from shotmaking than defense. and that we can get into something like a safety/position battle where the skill difference isn't as great and randomness/luck narrows it even more. if you're loathe to that style, i hope to get you there. if you're well accustomed to that, i'm SOL and going to figure out a way to get inspired quickly or fall into that i've-already-lost mindset.
The big problem with this is eventually you make mistakes. And then they capitalize on your mistakes. And then they get some confidence and then they play better and pretty soon, you couldn't beat them playing even because their game has jumped and your game has slumped.
yeah, i'm hoping that you show me if you have any weaknesses or tendencies.
I'd rather put myself in a position to capitalize on their mistakes and put the pressure on them. I do this by always being aware of the situation and giving them plenty of opportunities to make those mistakes.
i'm going into this thinking match thinking when i come to the table the 1st time, can i do anything for the end game? how do i advance the table for myself? running a sequence accelerates the end and removes blockers. where do i stop this run and duck? where do i miss the OB to? where do i move other balls and where do i leave the CB? where's he going to go and how is he going to procede? how can i thwart that? i want to overtake him going into the win-zone, and most definitely not lead him into it. how/where do i place the turd on his path?
Instead of giving them lock up safes I like to leave them tough shots with no leave or a tough table. Missing shots, even if they aren't 'supposed' to make them will shake their confidence. Plus, I've learned the hard way that poor players kick hard and have good stuff happen way too often. Giving them a kick shot that would stymie a better player doesn't phase them at all. Because they look at it as a free shot and hit it warp speed. Anything can happen and most of them aren't a good outcome for ME.
this is a great point. though it's an outlier play that i'd never invoke against a similarly-classed opponent, i am ready to go nuclear and bust out the rack if i feel i'm standing at my final inning and there's no hope. if you leave me just enough oxygen to be feeble, it will keep me from sensing death. if somehow i get to hill before you, i would consider this option every time. maybe in that situation you are better of getting me to attempt and bogart a sequence than to leave me with nothing to start on. launching a bomb is the underdog's perogative .
If there is a lot of trouble in the rack I like to let them get to it first. They will usually break it up and make a mistake giving you an easy runout.
Sometimes I'll just let them shoot at the 4 or 5 ball knowing that odds are they will run a few balls and leave me with an easy two ball out.
this is where i see the crux of the rack in my winning scenario. maybe i can assume i'll get 1 inning a game. can i hope for 3? probably not. if i can get to the table at this stage, i figure i can only run out the simplest layout 2-5% of the time. so i'll instead be thinking back to what you're shooting pattern has been and hoping i can setup a way to hook you.
It takes a little practice to get the feel for it but now my win% has improved dramatically over bad players.
This only works with people who are legitimately lower handicaps.