9 foot table slightly under or over 50"x90"

Since none of you have even come close to the real effects of an out of line playing surface I'll explain the real effects, even though it's minor. On a 9ft for example, a playing surface with the dementions less than 50"×100" like say 49 3/4" ×99 3/4" it adds a 1/4" to the pocket shelfs making them deeper, whereas if the playing surface is say 50 1/4"× 100 1/4" it decreases the pocket shelf depths by making them a 1/4" more shallow.
 
Last edited:
You need to have the rails cut and calibrated to fit the new super speed cushions if you don't do that then your rail sights will be a little off. I recommend Jack Zimmerman he does excellent work. Him and James have just got done restoring my Brunswick Anniversary 9 ft table
 
Wrong.
(but nobody will ever convince you of that, so please don't get it started)

So you are saying if I want a table to play more difficult I would want a shallower pocket shelf and a deeper pocket shelf will play easier????

I find that hard to believe but I will certainly investigate that. I always thought Valley pockets played easier than Diamonds because of the short pocket shelf even though the pockets are very close in width. Who woulda thought that a ball sitting in the jaws of the pocket would be harder to make when 70% of the ball is visible??? That is all news to me but everything on the interweb is true from what I have heard.
 
Since none of you have even come close to the real effects of an out of line playing surface I'll explain the real effects, even though it's minor. On a 9ft for example, a playing surface with the dementions less than 50"×100" like say 49 3/4" ×99 3/4" it adds a 1/4" to the pocket shelfs making them deeper, whereas if the playing surface is say 50 1/4"× 100 1/4" it decreases the pocket shelf depths by making them a 1/4" more shallow.

That just cannot be true Glen, I was informed by low500 that pocket shelf depth is meaningless.
 
Back
Top