our apa lo has introduced a new format in our area called jr masters.
it is based on the regular masters format with a few differences.
1. limited to handicaps 5 and below.
2. non handicapped play race to 5
3 6 9 ball and 3 8 ball matches.
4. rules same as masters.
5. limited to 3 or 4 man teams.
he has just introduced this format and is trying to drum up players interested.
i have already talked to a few players and they are interested in forming a team with me.
if we get up enough teams we will have a qualifier for vegas just like the other formats.
man i cant wait to get this started.
what do you guys think an bout this format ?
Interesting that they made it for 5 and below in Memphis when it is 6 and under in Raleigh. "Jr. Masters" has been around Raleigh for quite a while now. It came about because the Masters participation was declining as people realized that there were only a handful of teams that were really in contention during the city tournament. Unless your team is stacked with all APA 7/9's, your chances of going to nationals are were very small. Now, with a separate city tournament for lower-ranked players, they have revived the format. Good for business, but not really good for pool, in my opinion.
Here are a few things I don't like about "Jr. Masters":
- There is currently no Junior Masters Nationals bracket, so these teams go compete with Masters teams in vegas and don't stand much of a chance.
- The rank cutoff forces Jr. Masters players to play in a handicapped division as well to maintain their rank. This gives even more incentive to sandbag.
- The "best" Jr. Masters teams are going to be the teams with the best of whatever the cutoff rank is. What about the 7's that can't compete with the 9's in Masters, or the 4's that are outmatched in Jr. Masters?
- They mixed in the Jr. Masters teams with Masters teams to fill out the divisions. Before Jr. Masters, even the weak Masters teams used to have 1 or 2 SL7+ players on them, so you still had to play. Now, when my Masters team plays a Jr. Masters team, they don't usually make it into double digits (out of a possible 21). I would say it's good experience for the Jr. Masters players and be okay with it, but a lot of them aren't that interested in improving because they risk moving up and being forced to play Masters.
With all that said, I do encourage lower ranked players around here to play Jr. Masters if they have an interest in improving their game. They get to play strong players throughout the session and then play amongst themselves during the city tournament to go play Nationals, so it's a great deal for them.