Jimmy M. said:I was dead serious. I can understand that some geometrical relationship between the balls and the pockets could exist to where an aiming point could be easily determined using some system that exploits that relationship. However, in the case of combinations, unlike pockets which are always in the same spot, the secondary target (the second ball in the combination), is not always in the same spot. It could be anywhere on the table.
Well then...my above offer is available...:wink:
However....(If I understand what you are looking for)....I don't think the method I use is going to fit the type of method you reference...and I really don't think it exists....(like you describe)
Chances are (I hope) you already are doing something similar to what I do...(If not I need to re-analyze what the heck I am doing)
LOL...Now that I think about this...it really is kind of comical that a borderline banger...(me) would be offering up methods to a borderline pro...(jimmy).........This whole situation needs to be turned around...