That was a great match by two great players. Neither one wastes any time. They just get up there and clear the balls off the table, only hesitating for a moment after the break to figure out their strategy for running the rack. Not a lot of drama and fanfare in the way either of them play. Basically no wasted motion of any kind. If an occasional hard shot comes up they may look at it for an extra few moments before firing it in. I did not see one missed kick resulting in BIH, and I only saw one miss on a shot that should have been made, a missed five ball by Ignazio early in the match.
At this level it comes down to who has the most effective break. Ignazio won five games in a row from 4-2 down to take the lead at 7-4. From there it was all Chang, as he ran out almost every rack, scratching one time on the break, with Ignazio failing to convert. Chang broke from the middle, with a medium strong break, emphasizing cue ball control. He stopped the cue ball near the center of the table almost every time. Only one time did he fail to make a ball on the break.
Both these guys make it look so easy, and it is for them. They have the cue ball on a string and once in line they stay in line. No wonder they are two of the best in the world. Pretty awesome display of pool at its highest level. Too bad someone had to lose here.
I will only add this. These tables are unquestionably softer than the Diamonds used in the U.S. Open. For players this good, I would prefer to see them playing on tougher equipment. I think, just like in golf, that's what makes the U.S. Open such a tough test. Flinch once and you hang the ball up on a Diamond. Not so here, as the pockets were more forgiving.