I hope that was a typo and you meant to say 1/4-ball hit. A 3/4-full hit causes a cut of about 14.5 degrees if you ignore contact-induced throw, or about 13 degrees if you do.vapoolplayer said:...
and for anyone using sectional aiming (i.e. 3/4 ball hit = 48 degrees etc, etc)...
Bob Jewett said:I hope that was a typo and you meant to say 1/4-ball hit. A 3/4-full hit causes a cut of about 14.5 degrees if you ignore contact-induced throw, or about 13 degrees if you do.
drivermaker said:I wouldn't be surprised that Leveck is scurrying around right now to add it into an addendum which will be sent to all past purchasers or to be included in Aiming On The Cutting Edge II.![]()
Hi Randy,randyg said:BOB: Buy the darn book!!!!
Bob Jewett said:Hi Randy,
While I'm waiting for my copy to arrive...
I'd guess that you have the book already. Of all the systems listed in the book, which do you personally feel are the most worthwhile to try working into your game? Which do you feel should have been left out of the book.
I was hoping to see your opinion of the various systems. I suspect that you have far more experience teaching people how to aim than Todd does.randyg said:Hi Bob
Todd lists several systems and does a very good job explaining each of them. He even goes as far as rating all of them, good-to-bad.
To my pleasure he ranks one of Hal Houle's system the best. It happens to be my personal aiming system. Can't wait for you to review the book and give us your feedback....randyg
Bob Jewett said:I was hoping to see your opinion of the various systems. I suspect that you have far more experience teaching people how to aim than Todd does.
Which of Hal's many systems is explained in the book? Does Todd's explanation seem to align well with what you learned during your discussions with Hal, or is it a different system or explanation entirely?