JAM said:A veteran one-hole player whom I have known for years have given up pool and is now dealing cards for a living in Baltimore. He's making a lucrative living.
JAM
I've got to be the biggest idiot in the world. Everbody else can get on and run these programs, and I haven't the foggiest. Even the free sites.Hal said:Does anyone here go to Partypoker.com? It's cool. You can play free or pay. There is a $50.00 minimum deposit if you play with real money. Tournaments range from .50 cent buy in to whatever.
By the way, I mentioned pool in the title.![]()
Hal said:Does anyone here go to Partypoker.com? It's cool. You can play free or pay. There is a $50.00 minimum deposit if you play with real money. Tournaments range from .50 cent buy in to whatever.
By the way, I mentioned pool in the title.![]()
Hal said:Does anyone here go to Partypoker.com? It's cool. You can play free or pay. There is a $50.00 minimum deposit if you play with real money. Tournaments range from .50 cent buy in to whatever.
By the way, I mentioned pool in the title.![]()
OldHasBeen said:(IMHO) Hold'em Poker has to come down to the luck of the River MOST of the time.
TY & GL
Johnny "V" said:The thing that has always bothered me about playing online is Instant Messaging. If you have ever seen tilt on ESPN you will know where I am going with this. With IM and a few poker buddies you could clean out quite a few players and share the wealth without no one knowing the diff. 4 of you logon to a table, share what you have for hands on IM and if one of your partners has a better hand then you you drop out. So essentially the iggy or iggys are betting against one player with 4 hands. BlackJack and Craps should be safe from it but any of the stud, draw or holdem games are too easy to cheat at.
JV
Perk said:As far as collusion goes, they have programs implemented to prevent this. If you are found at the same tables as other players alot, they will catch you. Read the faq. At my house, I wasnt able to have a laptop and my cpu logged in at the same time, not even for play money. I was gonna play against my son.
I guess you have to look at it as a gamble. It happens in live games also, you just have to know when to play. You can pick your tables, and monitor the types of games you get into online. Its even easier to pick a good game online. At the casino's around here, you are forced to a chair with 1 chance at a move. You can watch multiple certain tables for HOURS before you sit down online if you want.
Another advantage (some say disadvantage) that you can do online is play up to 4 tables at once, more if you use 2 different sites. So you can only play the strongest hands period, and not get bored with folding all the time. Sometimes you have to quickly drop a medium hand to focus on another, but it can work (especially if you have a huge monitor).
I like it, but I am not gonna drop 100's of dollars either. I would rather play online and have a chance to win alot, than join some of the local tourneys around here not at a casino, since the state jumped in and gets some of the money. They are all over the place.
mjantti said:Good post Perk. They indeed have a system which follows if same players are playing on the same table frequently. And no, you cant change your user name.
I've also heard rumours that Party Poker has the system of equal distribution of money. Which means that if you win a lot, you'll get more bad beats from the system than normally. They just want to have more people playing without anyone getting broke to keep the rake amount high. Heard this from a guy who has been playing a lot of poker at Party Poker and also in casinos. He said that the frequency of bad beats at PP after a winning streak is much higher than in normal casino play.
nfty9er said:If you believe that rumor I have a bridge I will sell you in Brooklyn or some swamp land in Florida. That kind of system would be equal to cheating and dishonesty and these multi million dollar poker websites do not need that nor want it. Let's see, they can program their random dealing program to adjust to the winners and losers of over 70,000 players to pick out the winners and give them bad beats. I dont think so. They could care less who wins or loses, people are clamoring to play. Random deals are just that random with no preferences. That wouuld be impossible. Thats why they invented the random program was to make it equal for everybody.