Side-Pocket
New member
Are all grades of Aramith balls even the vintage sets better than regular no name ball sets? I purchased a vintage unused set with a stripe flaw and was wondering if I am still getting a high-quality billiard ball set.
Lol. I have a box I got for 13 bucks off Amazon. Still haven't tried them. Years...Yes, every Aramith set, even the low grades, are better than the no-name brands. The no-name brands are not phenolic.
that is true but now you can find a set in China made of phenolic that is just as good when it comes to material. The only differences is the QA is not as good as Aramith. So it's possible the variance between balls are bigger than Aramith.Yes, every Aramith set, even the low grades, are better than the no-name brands. The no-name brands are not phenolic.
Are you talking about Ali-express type vendors, or Dynasphere? If the latter, Dynaspere is not "no-name". If the former, I wasn't aware the dirt cheap ones were phenolic, but rather polyester.that is true but now you can find a set in China made of phenolic that is just as good when it comes to material. The only differences is the QA is not as good as Aramith. So it's possible the variance between balls are bigger than Aramith.
EBay is kinda hit/ miss with fakes, the stripe thing seems odd.Thanks for the responses. I purchased my set of Aramith's off of eBay for $59 new unused in the original packaging, but the 10-ball stripe is 90 degrees from the rest of the stripes which I thought was not a deal breaker for the money. I'll see how different they play and sound from the 20-year-old set of standard balls we are now using. Hopefully it was a good purchase.
There is some polyester and some phenolic on Ali or Temu. you do have to look closelyAre you talking about Ali-express type vendors, or Dynasphere? If the latter, Dynaspere is not "no-name". If the former, I wasn't aware the dirt cheap ones were phenolic, but rather polyester.