I agree and appreciate your candor and consideration of my viewpoint.
Yes, when I refer to knowledge what I am really saying is that the people who say that BHE is crap and doesn't work and the low deflection tech is the be all end all because statements like that may prevent people from gaining the knowledge of how to use BHE and might prevent them from achieving their best game. I am NOT saying that BHE is the be all end all. It IS not, and that is why I was hesitant, atleast this time, to mention that Efren uses it and is who taught it to me (although there I go mentioning it again)LOL. I don't want to fall into the fallacy of correct by association, although I sometimes do. I only dislike people claiming the benefits of low deflection tech and bad mouthing BHE, because if you've used it, you know that it does work in many if not most situations and it can make long shots that require a lot of side spin much easier to make consistently. You're right bout snooker players possibly not using it, but they also don't usually use the amount of side spin, (if at all), that pool players use. Again, I did not mean to infer that BHE or my arguments are the only valid ones, as I know that I don't know all there is to know about billiards based games and will never try to claim that I do. I do get frustrated though when people try to bad mouth BHE, and it is probably because of the fact that I didn't believe that it could possibly work and didn't even give it a chance for a looooooong time.
One other thing, you CAN use BHE with your Z shaft. I did with someone's Z shaft earlier today. You just have to bridge at about 16-18 inches. LOL.... It's not very fun, let's put it that way.....
DoomCue said:You have an interesting viewpoint. There are many who would argue the exact opposite - that BHE prevents players from learning more about the game and developing a good stroke. BHE can become a crutch, and if players don't know how to deal with shots where BHE doesn't work, they're in trouble. I teach beginners to use BHE, as it takes some of the mystery out of applying english, but I also try to help them understand that whether "parallel" or BHE is used, the cue ends up in the same place and it's really just personal preference (obviously, you prefer BHE). What that has to do with stroke or knowledge, I'm not sure.
So much of this game comes down to personal preference, from shafts, to ferrules, to weights, to wraps, to dominant eye, to stance, to ways of thinking. My personal way of thinking and shooting is totally right... FOR ME. You obviously think BHE is a great method to avoid squirt (and it is, as long as the pivot point is in a place where a bridge can be made). And that's great... FOR YOU. You keep mentioning tight pockets and how non-BHE players in your mind would have a tougher time on them. Let's debunk that right now - the top potters in the world play snooker, and very rarely do you see a snooker player using BHE.
Check out my sig - I use a Z shaft. BHE won't work for me, and I don't mind that since I've not used BHE with any of my shafts. It's nice to know about though, because there have been times when I didn't have my cues and I had to play with strange equipment. Knowing how to find the pivot point allowed me to use BHE to some degree.
BHE isn't pool's Holy Grail, it's a simple method used to take advantage of the science involved with squirt. Low squirt cues do the same thing by a different manner. Either way, you still have to line up right to see the desired contact and aim points. Either method gets you there, you can't proclaim one more accurate than another. That's in the shooter.
Personally, I think a BHE player who can't aim "parallel" probably is going to have a tougher time than a player who uses only "parallel" english. "Parallel" english works on EVERY shot, while BHE shots work only in conditions with a specific set of circumstances.
-djb <-- just my two cents - you can go back to arguing with PJ
Yes, when I refer to knowledge what I am really saying is that the people who say that BHE is crap and doesn't work and the low deflection tech is the be all end all because statements like that may prevent people from gaining the knowledge of how to use BHE and might prevent them from achieving their best game. I am NOT saying that BHE is the be all end all. It IS not, and that is why I was hesitant, atleast this time, to mention that Efren uses it and is who taught it to me (although there I go mentioning it again)LOL. I don't want to fall into the fallacy of correct by association, although I sometimes do. I only dislike people claiming the benefits of low deflection tech and bad mouthing BHE, because if you've used it, you know that it does work in many if not most situations and it can make long shots that require a lot of side spin much easier to make consistently. You're right bout snooker players possibly not using it, but they also don't usually use the amount of side spin, (if at all), that pool players use. Again, I did not mean to infer that BHE or my arguments are the only valid ones, as I know that I don't know all there is to know about billiards based games and will never try to claim that I do. I do get frustrated though when people try to bad mouth BHE, and it is probably because of the fact that I didn't believe that it could possibly work and didn't even give it a chance for a looooooong time.
One other thing, you CAN use BHE with your Z shaft. I did with someone's Z shaft earlier today. You just have to bridge at about 16-18 inches. LOL.... It's not very fun, let's put it that way.....
Last edited: