Attention Moderators

I'm not telling anyone how to do anything. I just pointed out how many posts you've made today......when, WHERE, and the time.

The owners can choose what to allow and what not to allow in the pool and non-pool related sections.

No, that is not true. What's new?

You labeled them as pornographic.

That implies that Mike & Jerry would allow pornography to be posted on their site & that I & others would be posting it.

Like I have said, You've shown with your disgusting & immoral suggestion along with rather many other things that you have said, that YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO REGARD FOR THE TRUTH.

Perhaps that is why you can tolerate & even promote the inaccurate description that can be misleading to many.

You see your goal of silencing me as justifying ANY means no matter how low & disgusting & immoral of a falsehood that you want to perpetuate.

You either are what you are... or you have let the obsession of getting the selective censorship that you want take you down a very bad road.
 
SOFT PORN.......it is what it is. I didn't say whether it's right or wrong.

Again, they can allow what they want. It's their site.

The TRUTH is that you post 98% of it.............then minutes later post that you're gonna pray for us.

What is that supposed to mean?

Are you muslim?

Do you have any idea why I post those pics of those beautiful women?

Do I have to post them IF I wanted to just go online & look at pics of beautiful women.

The ONLY time I look at them on line is when I am looking for pics to post in the various categories like the ones that were there when I stumbled on to NPR, like Foxy Friday, the Tattoo thread & a couple of others. I started the Portraits of Beauty thread for a specific reason.

If you see a beautiful sexy woman walking down the street does that you mean that you can not pray for someone that gets hit by a car few minutes later.

I feel like I am teaching a junior high 'physical hygiene' or sex education class here.

It seems that you might be one of those that thinks that exotic dancers are sluts...

Instead of a mother of 2 that a guy ran out out & is trying to support her two children the best that she can.
 
Last edited:
You're getting close, right? You must be watering at the mouth right about now, lol.

What does that mean?

Is not porno short for pornography? It is.

Did you not use that word porno? You did.
 
Last edited:
English no one has appointed you to save the naive world from the machinations and evil spoutings of CTE.

You have salient points based on subjective observations. You have made these same points over,over and over over 3 years or more.

It is time that you removed your opinions from threads that espouse CTE

In turn start your own threads on non-CTE.

I lieu of this find a church where you can stand in front of a congregation and postulate to your hearts content.

Contrary to your beliefs you are not here to safeguard and protect grown men.

Bail out and read a book.
 
I would prefer if he played more pool. Moving around is a heck of a lot better for him that sitting all day posting on the internet.


English no one has appointed you to save the naive world from the machinations and evil spoutings of CTE.

You have salient points based on subjective observations. You have made these same points over,over and over over 3 years or more.

It is time that you removed your opinions from threads that espouse CTE

In turn start your own threads on non-CTE.

I lieu of this find a church where you can stand in front of a congregation and postulate to your hearts content.

Contrary to your beliefs you are not here to safeguard and protect grown men.

Bail out and read a book.
 
In case one needed to know, the forum rules:

By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

As a member of the industry, and from the nature of my primary job, my biggest concern is that besides these pictures being on this site, it also gives free and unfettered access to anyone (including minors) from viewing, as a login is not required.
 
How sweet. I thought I was your favorite.

That was NOT directed to you.

If somehow that happened, it was a computer glitch of some sort or one caused by me.


But somehow I think it is just you quoting OUT of Context...

So that you can continue with the type of games that adolescents play.
 
No, I did not use that word (porno).

You seem to be the common denominator when it comes to most of the flame wars on here...........why do you think the Fast Larry thread was started? And that is true ever since you arrived on AZ, CTE is just the most recent.

My technical mistake.

You did not use the 'word' "porno".

You used the 'word' "PORN"

Is not "PORN" short for pornography?

Just as when you slithered into the gutter to imply & suggest the disgusting & immoral action of child molestation upon me...

You are now implying & suggesting that Mike & Jerry are allowing PORN, short for pornography, to be posted on their site.

Are you not?

If not, can you please give a rational & logical explanation of how you are not doing that?
 
Last edited:
English no one has appointed you to save the naive world from the machinations and evil spoutings of CTE.

You have salient points based on subjective observations. You have made these same points over,over and over over 3 years or more.

It is time that you removed your opinions from threads that espouse CTE

In turn start your own threads on non-CTE.

I lieu of this find a church where you can stand in front of a congregation and postulate to your hearts content.

Contrary to your beliefs you are not here to safeguard and protect grown men.

Bail out and read a book.

Sir,

I did not know that YOU were universally elected, appointed, authorized, & sworn in to attempt to control me with YOUR dictates.

I also did NOT know that YOU were universally elected, appointed, authorized & sworn in to make the determination when it is "time" for the truth to STOP being told.

Perhaps YOU should direct YOUR attentions to getting the inaccurate description of 'an objective aiming system' to be "STOPPED".

I think it is rather telling that you chose to use the words "save the naive" & "safe guard & protect".

It seems that you do not care about the potential many that might be mislead by that inaccurate description.

It seems that you would rather that they be allowed to be mislead by that inaccurate description.

Interesting.
 
I would prefer if he played more pool. Moving around is a heck of a lot better for him that sitting all day posting on the internet.

Again you show yourself to be wrong, again.

You know nothing in regards to what is better for me & my back with a ruptured L5 disc & the S1 nerve.

Complete Rest is the best policy after any movement that puts any 'strain' on it.
 
In case one needed to know, the forum rules:

By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

As a member of the industry, and from the nature of my primary job, my biggest concern is that besides these pictures being on this site, it also gives free and unfettered access to anyone (including minors) from viewing, as a login is not required.

IMO, You've personally violated several aspect that rule.

Do you know what "sexually oriented" means?

Michael Angelo's statue of a partially nude "Venus" is NOT "sexually oriented" & that statue shows more nudity than anything that Mike & Jerry allow to be posted in those NPR threads.

It seems that you too are saying that Mike & Jerry have allowed "sexually oriented" material to be posted on their site.

If a minor can access this site then they are capable of accessing any site from which I have transported anything because "I" do not access any restricted sites.

This too should be very telling to whet extent some CTE proponents will go to in order to attempt to get the selective censorship that they want.

I think the neutral parties reading this thread can certainly see that it's all because no rational logical explanation can be given to support that inaccurate description of 'an objective aiming system'.
 
Complete rest.........WRONG! The best thing someone with your condition is to stay active as much as possible.........getting up off your ass and MOVE. Sitting around all day is the worst thing you can do.........will only make the pain and stiffness worse.

I know this for a fact.......not only because I'm a licensed medical practitioner (PA-C, MPAS), but have had 2 surgeries on my cervical spine. Activity, even simple walking around a pool table, increases blood flow to the spine.

A little clip from one study:

"Once pain is adequately controlled (it will most likely not go away completely) the most important thing patients can do is stay active.
Exercises not only preserve what functionality exists; they are the single best way of healing the back. Exercise increases the flow of blood and oxygen and other nutrients to the back and discs, thereby keeping them hydrated and as pliable as possible. Exercise can also improve one's sense of well-being by promoting the release of endorphins, a natural pain-reliever and stress reducer"

Provide us with study-based evidence for your assertion that complete rest is best for what you have.

I sincerely hope that you do not & are not practicing "medicine".

Note the word "practicing".

I've not had surgery on my back. Rest IS what IS best for ME & MY back after I do physical activity.

I takes a day to two days for it to return to a non issue state.

But you & your self proclaimed arrogance know more about & what is best for ME & MY particular case vs the "clinical".

I've seen rather many arrogant ball player make rather many a mistake that wound up losing games for their team mates.

Arrogance is never a good trait in my opinion.
 
Like I said, it is what it is. Which is OK.

The sheer number and frequency of posts would lead some to believe that you may be suffering from some kind of disorder, but anybody that thinks in a rational, logical manner knows exactly why you post thousands of soft porn photos in the NPR section.

You keep quoting "porn", and leave out the "soft" part.

Oh... now you seem to be changing your tune.

If it is, as you say, OK, then why are you attacking it?

You seem to not understand that pornography itself is rather very difficult to define as it is a SUBJECTIVE & RELATIVE matter as to how an individual sees such matters.

What is pornographic to one individual is not to another. Many wanted & tried to get Playboy Magazine declared as pornographic. They failed to impose their subjective interpretations onto the general public.

That is why I said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder & only a smut monger sees smut where none exists.

The determination of the word you choice to use 'soft' is also a subjective term. IF the question is whether or not something is pornographic or not, the answer is either yes or no & their is no other real differentiation.

It is just like objective vs subjective. it is either one or the other. It can NOT be 66% objective & 34% subjective. IT, the IT, is either one or the other. Something can NOT be 34% pornographic & 66% moral.

It seems that many CTEers have extreme difficulty in understanding just what is subjective vs what is objective.

Perhaps THAT is at the root cause of the entire issue regarding the inaccurate description of "an objective aiming system", it's the CTEers inability to understand the differentiation.
 
Back
Top