Looks like Fedor gained some weight! Must be the good food in Vietnam!In the end, Mother Nature always wins. Wishing all the players good rolls and steady nerves at the Hanoi Open.
Reminds me of the 2003 U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship in the thick of Tropical Storm Isabela. The power went out, and play was delayed for a full day. Everything came to a standstill. When play finally resumed, matches ran late into the night, some starting in the early morning and finishing around 2 a.m. Keith McCready gave it everything he had, but on the final day, running on almost no sleep, he just hit a wall and lost his mojo. But what a fight it was.
Photo credit: Fedor Gorst having some fun with AI.
View attachment 855921
Because of the rapids ahead, duhWhy is the guy behind him wearing a helmet...?LOL
As a viewer, I can do without the many lopsided scores in early Stage 1 play. On the other hand, I believe that having large fields in the Matchroom majors enables local players having lesser skills to test their hands against the world's best, and that this, in turn, helps to stimulate interest in the game locally.Day 1 was a lot of fun, although I do wish they'd figure something else out with regards to seeding and early matchups. The litany of 9-0/9-1/9-2 scores isn't all that fun. Gotta hunt for a good matchup.
I agree completely. To clarify, my objection is not to dead money. Rather, it is to arranging tournaments so dead money always plays all-stars. I know having a big-name matchup, say, Fedor v Biado, in an early round might not be considered fair to either, but completely randomizing the draw and having those possibilities and an occasional headline matchup early with more tight races (dud v dud and stud v stud both happening) would make those early rounds more appealing. And it might actually increase the interest in those dead money folks if they know they won't necessarily be pitted against a touring pro.As a viewer, I can do without the many lopsided scores in early Stage 1 play. On the other hand, I believe that having large fields in the Matchroom majors enables local players having lesser skills to test their hands against the world's best, and that this, in turn, helps to stimulate interest in the game locally.
In truth, the "dead money" players as a group are adding a lot to our sport. Nearly every pool player in Vietnam probably knows at least one person that is playing in the Hanoi Open and it is one of the reasons that the event draws so much attention.
Don't fret. By day three, virtually all the "dead money" players will have been eliminated.
Ah, gotcha. As you rightly point out, the negative of having seeding is that you get more early round mismatches, but I feel the benefits outweigh the costs. The benefit is that, on average, a seeded event will produce a stronger contingent in Stage 2. Another argument in favor of seeding is that it tends to a) reward consistent excellence and b) encourages participation for the elite players.I agree completely. To clarify, my objection is not to dead money. Rather, it is to arranging tournaments so dead money always plays all-stars. I know having a big-name matchup, say, Fedor v Biado, in an early round might not be considered fair to either, but completely randomizing the draw and having those possibilities and an occasional headline matchup early with more tight races (dud v dud and stud v stud both happening) would make those early rounds more appealing. And it might actually increase the interest in those dead money folks if they know they won't necessarily be pitted against a touring pro.