First a few points that most agree on (maybe not but here goes)
1. Weight furtherest from the tip lowers the deflection
2. Weight directly under the hand adds to control (like a shorter hammer weight is closer to hand)
3. Weight in front of hand helps cue rest on the brigde and improves topspin
Since pool cues aren't designed like golf clubs (specific cues for specific shots-except breaking and jumping) whats the trade off
I guess you would want at least 6 1/4 ounces in front of my hand (weight of a cueball) but distrubuted as close to the hand as possible for control and the rest of the weight behind the hand but again close as possible to the hand
Some cuemakers use weight bolts and joint pins for "weight tweeking" but that is as far from the hand as it gets. Shouldn't most of the weight be in the handle area under and around the hand......... just a thought
Oh and Merry Christmas and happy New year
1. Weight furtherest from the tip lowers the deflection
2. Weight directly under the hand adds to control (like a shorter hammer weight is closer to hand)
3. Weight in front of hand helps cue rest on the brigde and improves topspin
Since pool cues aren't designed like golf clubs (specific cues for specific shots-except breaking and jumping) whats the trade off
I guess you would want at least 6 1/4 ounces in front of my hand (weight of a cueball) but distrubuted as close to the hand as possible for control and the rest of the weight behind the hand but again close as possible to the hand
Some cuemakers use weight bolts and joint pins for "weight tweeking" but that is as far from the hand as it gets. Shouldn't most of the weight be in the handle area under and around the hand......... just a thought
Oh and Merry Christmas and happy New year