After five replies have you noticed the differing opinions? That's because it doesn't matter which pin you use.
The only real thing you might consider is the type of joint you use. A metal joint (stainless) wiill have a slightly harder hit. A wood to wood will be slightly softer. Neither will affect the cues value.
Talk it over with your cue maker.
by whom?Getting my first cue built 4 points
Whatever you like.and all need some opinions on wood choice
I'm of the camp that says that pin choice doesn't matter. A competent cue maker is paramount.and what's the best pin
Odd. The Predator 314 and the OB2 don't feel similar.I will be playing with a perdator 314 or an ob2 thanks
"Talk it over with your cue maker."
That's the best advice you could possibly hope for. All the resident experts are able to offer is their opinion which may be just peachey for them but it has nothing to do with you & your cue.
All the pin is asked to do is to keep the shaft securely attached to the handle.
It doesn't matter what pitch, thread count or diameter. If the pin is adequate for it's task, it doesn't matter.
Why on earth would you have someone tell you what YOU want in a cue?
Talk to YOUR cue-maker. My guess is that he might know a little more than the resident 'experts'.
A metal joint (stainless) wiill have a slightly harder hit. A wood to wood will be slightly softer.
It's actually the exact opposite. The stainless joint tends to mellow the hit of the cue, where the phenolic jointed wood to wood joints have a harder hit. Shaft taper and tip will have more affect on the "hit" of the cue than the joint material, though.
Methinks Shawn is correct here. The stainless steel joints tend to act as "shock absorbing brakes," attenuating the vibrations and resonance of the hit from traveling down the cue. (In other words, any vibrations or resonance from the hit tends to "stop" right at, and not be transferred through, the big metal "block" of the stainless steel joint.)
Whereas in a phenolic wood-to-wood joint, there's nothing blocking the vibrations and resonance of the hit from traveling down the cue.
My Joss 828, with its stainless steel joint, is one of the most mellow-hitting cues I've ever owned, no matter what shaft I put on it (and I've several, from different makers). But the wood-to-wood cues I own (e.g. Hammerhead, Mali) tend to give me more "feedback" from the hit.
Some may prefer the mellow hit; others prefer receiving the feedback from the hit. It's all a very personal thing. There is no one-size-fits-all "best."
-Sean
The purest hitting cue will always be the 1pc. house cue because there is no jnt. to cause disruption of the vibration.
I have to laugh everytime I see or hear someone write/say this. I know what you're trying to say, but really... I've never played with a one-piece cue that felt as solild/pure/vibration dampened as, say, my Schuler or Lambros.
Has anyone?
Fred
It might be better to just make a list of things you do like and things you definitely don't like about a cue. Have that list handy and share it with the cue maker. I once ordered a custom Huebler in ebony, ivory and maple with a stainless joint. The cue featured ahnks inlayed in the butt as my son had told me that was my symbol. :smile:
Cue arrived - absolutely gorgeous workmanship! However every time I stroked a ball with that cue a bit of a metallic sound hit my ears. Other players tried it, some would hear the same thing and others wouldn't. The sound absolutely drove me crazy and rather than give Huebler a chance to correct it, I simply sold the cue. Jon Wilson bought the cue and was totally happy with it. He played very well with that cue.
Hmmm, I wonder if that cue is still around...
An ahnk![]()