Williebetmore said:
SJM,
Perhaps race to 5 in 9-ball will not give you the results you desire. Are we positive that short race 9-ball is the truest test of "who is best"????
Yes, we're positive. Seven races to five is plenty enough opportunity to justify your inclusion in the knockout event that determines the champion. Anyone who isn't up to going 4 - 3, a near but not total guarantee of qualification for the knockout stage, has no right ot bemoan their exclusion form the knockout stage.
In the knockout stage, as we saw, a race to eleven on tight equipment makes the better players far less vulnerable to the upset. A last eight of Hohmann, Immonen, Wu, Kuo, Morris, VanDenberg, Huang, and Manalo, is enough evidence for me that this format brings the cream to the top and crowns a champion that must be deemed a towering presence in the sport.
Let's not forget that the straight pool championships of yesteryear did not necessarily crown the best player, but the double elimination, race to 150 on tough equipment, format did ensure that the late stages included many of the true superstars of the game and that a glittering pedigree was needed to win the championship.
That was good enough for me then, and today's WPC format is good enough for me now. It wasn't, however, until they began using tough equipment. On loose pockets, a race to 150 in straight pool is awfully short. On tight pockets, a race to 150 is a match of considerable length in which the better player has a big edge. It's exactly the same with a race to eleven in nine ball, and the final race to seventeen in the WPC is very much to my liking.