With the idea that playing great in straight pool comes with having great knowledge about the game and making the right decisions on what balls to shoot in what order, how to best maneuver the cue ball, how to break-up clusters, etc. Has anyone tried getting a great player to assist them with a game by having the great player tell them exactly which ball to shoot next and where to leave the cue ball for the entire run?
I was just wondering if the average A player had a great player telling them exactly what to do for each shot—including what key ball to leave, what break ball to use, exactly how to break the clusters out, etc.—how many more balls do you think that they would run over their average or over their high run.
I know that in practice it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get a great player to spend the time to focus totally on your game to that level of detail (unless you paid them handsomely…lol). But it really makes me wonder what the average A player could achieve if the only difference was making every shot and doing all of the decision-making exactly the way the great player instructed them to and how the great player would do it.
I really wonder if the level of play would increase all that much if the player didn’t practice the general principles over time, but just executed everything exactly the way the great player advised them. I wonder if the shot selection that the great player would choose based on “their” ability and “their” stroke would be enough to cause missed balls and missed position for the average A player because of them attempting shots or position that they wouldn’t normally try. That brings up a whole different question. Is there really such a thing as the “best” shot to shoot in every situation, regardless of the player (in straight pool)…or is this so dependant on the players unique style and capability that any two great players probably would not consider the same series of shots as the best route to take in all situations.
Not sure what made me ponder of all of this…but thought that I would float it out there for opinions.
I was just wondering if the average A player had a great player telling them exactly what to do for each shot—including what key ball to leave, what break ball to use, exactly how to break the clusters out, etc.—how many more balls do you think that they would run over their average or over their high run.
I know that in practice it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get a great player to spend the time to focus totally on your game to that level of detail (unless you paid them handsomely…lol). But it really makes me wonder what the average A player could achieve if the only difference was making every shot and doing all of the decision-making exactly the way the great player instructed them to and how the great player would do it.
I really wonder if the level of play would increase all that much if the player didn’t practice the general principles over time, but just executed everything exactly the way the great player advised them. I wonder if the shot selection that the great player would choose based on “their” ability and “their” stroke would be enough to cause missed balls and missed position for the average A player because of them attempting shots or position that they wouldn’t normally try. That brings up a whole different question. Is there really such a thing as the “best” shot to shoot in every situation, regardless of the player (in straight pool)…or is this so dependant on the players unique style and capability that any two great players probably would not consider the same series of shots as the best route to take in all situations.
Not sure what made me ponder of all of this…but thought that I would float it out there for opinions.