Break Stats -- 2022 European Open Pool Championship (9-Ball), August 2022

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some aggregate break statistics from the 2022 European Open Pool Championship played August 9-14, 2022 at the Esperanto Congress and Cultural Center in Fulda, Germany. This was a 256-player 9-Ball event, produced by Matchroom Sport, with double elimination down to 64 players (32 on the winners' side and 32 on the one-loss side) and then single-elimination to the end. Albin Ouschan won the tournament, defeating Shane Van Boening in the final match.

The commentators were Michael McMullan, Phil Yates, Jeremy Jones, and Karl Boyes. The referees in the streamed matches were Marcel Eckardt, Desislava Bozhilova, Brendan Moore and one whose name I did not hear.

Conditions -- The conditions for the streamed matches included:
• Diamond 9-foot table with 4 1/4" corner pockets;​
• Simonis 860 shark grey cloth;​
• Aramith Tournament Black balls with a black-measles cue ball;​
• Accu-Rack racking template on the first 4 days (through the round of 32), triangle rack on the 5th and 6th days (last 16 players);​
• referee racks with the 9-ball on the foot spot (2-ball not necessarily in back location);​
• winner breaks from behind the head string in a box approximately 8" to each side of the long string;​
• no illegal-break rule, but referees enforce a forceful-break requirement;​
• no shot clock until the last 16 players, then a 30-second shot clock (60 sec. after the break), with one 30-sec. extension per player per rack;​
• foul on all balls;​
• jump cues allowed;​
• all slop counts; and​
• lag for the break in each match.​

These stats are for 13 matches (223 games), all from the single-elimination portion of the event. The 13 are the 5 matches streamed on Facebook on Friday (Round of 64 and Round of 32) and the 8 matches streamed on DAZN in the USA on Saturday and Sunday (Round of 16 to the end). These 13 matches were 21% of the total of 63 matches played in the single-elimination stage of the event, but only 2.7% of all 475 matches played in the event (479 scheduled less 3 forfeits and 1 disqualification). These 13 matches were races to 9 in the Round of 64 players; to 10 in the Rounds of 32 and 16; to 11 in the quarterfinal and semifinal matches; and to 13 in the final match. [Note: only about half of Match 8 below was shown on DAZN, but I watched the rest of it on YouTube.]

These 13 matches are listed here in the order in which they were played.

Friday, August 12
1. Joshua Filler defeated Eklent Kaçi 9-8 (Last 64)​
2. Alex Kazakis d. David Alcaide 9-2 (Last 64)​
3. Oscar Dominguez d. Tyler Styer 9-6 (Last 64)​
4. Shane Van Boening d. Wojciech Szewczyk 10-8 (Last 32)​
5. Jayson Shaw d. Daniele Corrieri 10-6 (Last 32)​

Saturday, August 13
6. Filler d. Shaw 10-3 (Last 16)​
7. Van Boening d. Sanjin Pehlivanovic 10-7 (Last 16)​
8. Albin Ouschan d. Denis Grabe 10-9 (Last 16)​
9. Mario He d. Filler 11-5 (Quarterfinal)​
10. Van Boening d. Mateusz Sniegocki 11-7 (Quarterfinal)​

Sunday, August 14
11. Ouschan d. He 11-9 (Semifinal)​
12. Van Boening d. Jose Alberto Delgado 11-8 (Semifinal)​
13. Ouschan d. Van Boening 13-11 (Final)​

Overall results
Successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Match winners -- 62% (79 of 127)​
Match losers -- 60% (58 of 96)​
Total -- 61% (137 of 223)
Breaker won the game:
Match winners -- 59% (75 of 127)​
Match losers -- 39% (37 of 96)​
Total -- 50% (112 of 223)
Break-and-run games on all breaks:
Match winners -- 30% (38 of 127)​
Match losers -- 23% (22 of 96)​
Total -- 27% (60 of 223)
Break-and-run games on successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Match winners -- 48% (38 of 79)​
Match losers -- 38% (22 of 58)​
Total -- 44% (60 of 137)

Here's a breakdown of the 223 games (for match winners and losers combined).

Breaker made at least one ball and did not foul:​
Breaker won the game: 86 (39% of the 223 games)​
Breaker lost the game: 51 (23%)​
Breaker fouled on the break:​
Breaker won the game: 2 (1%)​
Breaker lost the game: 22 (10%)​
Breaker broke dry (without fouling):​
Breaker won the game: 24 (11%)​
Breaker lost the game: 38 (17%)​
Therefore, whereas the breaker won 50% (112 of 223) of all games,​
He won 63% (86 of 137) of the games in which the break was successful (made at least one ball and did not foul).​
He won 30% (26 of 86) of the games in which the break was unsuccessful (fouled or dry).​

Break-and-run games -- The 60 break-and-run games represented 27% of all 223 games, 54% of the 112 games won by the breaker, and 44% of the 137 games in which the break was successful (made a ball and didn't foul).

The 60 break-and-run games consisted of 1 3-pack (by He), 11 2-packs, and 35 singles.

9-Balls on the break -- The 60 break-and-run games included 3 9-balls on the break (1.3% of all breaks) -- two by Filler and one by Shaw, all in their match.
 
Last edited:
Miscellany from the data for the 2022 European Open Pool Championship (9-Ball):
[This relates only to the 13 streamed single-elimination matches I watched, not to all matches in the event.]

• The most balls made on a single break was 4, done twice -- once by Kazakis (a game win, but not by B&R) and once by He (a B&R).

• The average number of balls made on the break was 1.0 (this includes dry and fouled breaks). On successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul), the average was 1.5.

• 57% (126 of 223) of the games ended in one inning – 27% (60) won by the breaker (B&R) and 30% (66) won by the non-breaker. 10% (22 of 223) of the games lasted more than 3 innings. The longest game (the 21-minute first game of the Filler/Kaçi match) ended on the non-breaker's 9th visit to the table.

• 48% (106 of 223) of the games were run out by the player who was at the table following the break. These run-outs were:
- By the breaker after successful breaks (B&R games) – 44% (60 of 137)​
- By the non-breaker after fouls on the break – 88% (21 of 24)​
- By the non-breaker after dry breaks – 40% (25 of 62)​

• The player who made the first ball after the break:
- Won the game in that same inning 70% of the time (153 of 220)​
- Won the game in a later inning 12% of the time (26 of 220)​
- Lost the game 19% of the time (41 of 220)​
[Note -- total games used here are 220 rather than 223 to eliminate the 3 games in which no ball was made after the break.]​

• Just one of these 13 matches went to hill/hill; the most lopsided was 9-2.

• The average minutes per game for all 13 matches was 6.3. For the matches that did not use a shot clock (Matches 1-8), the average was 6.5 Five of those 8 matches had no commercial breaks. For the matches that did use a time clock (Matches 9-13) the average was 6.2. All 5 of those matches had commercial breaks. In computing these averages, the elapsed time was measured from the lag until the winning ball was made (or conceded), so it includes time for racking and commercial breaks, if any. The commercial breaks were significant in the weekend matches, generally occurring after every 3 or 4 games in a match, and lasting about 3 minutes each.

• The match that was highest in average minutes per game, at 7.7 (with no commercial breaks), was Dominguez d. Styer 9-6. The match that was lowest in average minutes per game, at 4.5 (with commercial breaks), was Filler d. Shaw 10-3.

• Breaking fouls averaged 1 for every 9.3 games, other fouls 1 for every 2.4 games, and missed shots about 1 for every 2.6 games.

• One or more safeties were played in about 30% of all games and in 42% of games that were not B&Rs.
 
Last edited:
Thanks again for all your work.

Did you notice any time that the player was asked to break harder? All the matches I saw seemed to have no issue with that.

Also, were the golden breaks straight in or by a kiss?
 
Thanks again for all your work.

Did you notice any time that the player was asked to break harder? All the matches I saw seemed to have no issue with that.

Also, were the golden breaks straight in or by a kiss?
No, I never saw a ref speak to a player about not breaking forcefully enough. What an improvement over the robberies that sometimes occur with a 3-point rule.

All 3 9s on the break went in the left (breaker's view) foot pocket. The first one (Game 1) went in with a slight kiss right next to the pocket; without the kiss, it probably would have been a close hanger rather than falling. The second one (Game 3) went straight in at slow speed. Efforts were made after that to massage and tap the table. And Shaw gave the refs a lesson on racking with a triangle. The third one (Game 9) was kissed in from near the center of the foot rail.
 
Great stats. Breaker won the game 50% tells you all you need to know. Having the break was not an advantage in this event. The 27% break and run percent is almoSt beyond belief. I will defend all the players by saying that they are not as bad as this break rule made them look. At least, two superstars met in the final, but the level of play did not befit the occasion.

i figured I would enjoy this slower, more tactical form of nine ball but I enjoyed this event less than any event on the 2022 Matchroom Tour so far. That said, I am keeping an open mind, for perhaps it will grow on me.

For now, however, this break rule experiment looks like it has made the game less exciting to watch.
 
The break seemed to be a definite advantage for some players, such as Kaci.
I expect that the 50% breaker won stat will improve with experience.
My opinion is that this event was more exciting to watch.
 
Great stats. Breaker won the game 50% tells you all you need to know. Having the break was not an advantage in this event. The 27% break and run percent is almoSt beyond belief. I will defend all the players by saying that they are not as bad as this break rule made them look. At least, two superstars met in the final, but the level of play did not befit the occasion.

i figured I would enjoy this slower, more tactical form of nine ball but I enjoyed this event less than any event on the 2022 Matchroom Tour so far. That said, I am keeping an open mind, for perhaps it will grow on me.

For now, however, this break rule experiment looks like it has made the game less exciting to watch.
I like these numbers. Seems like somewhat of a solution for the break has been achieved.

Now back to the ball colors……easier to fix


Best
Fatboy 😃
 
Miscellany from the data for the 2022 European Open Pool Championship (9-Ball):
[This relates only to the 13 streamed single-elimination matches I watched, not to all matches in the event.]

• The most balls made on a single break was 4, done twice -- once by Kazakis (a game win, but not by B&R) and once by He (a B&R).

• The average number of balls made on the break was 1.1 (this includes dry and fouled breaks). On successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul), the average was 1.6.

• 57% (126 of 223) of the games ended in one inning – 27% (60) won by the breaker (B&R) and 30% (66) won by the non-breaker. 10% (22 of 223) of the games lasted more than 3 innings. The longest game (the 21-minute first game of the Filler/Kaçi match) ended on the non-breaker's 9th visit to the table.

• 48% (106 of 223) of the games were run out by the player who was at the table following the break. These run-outs were:
- By the breaker after successful breaks (B&R games) – 44% (60 of 137)​
- By the non-breaker after fouls on the break – 88% (21 of 24)​
- By the non-breaker after dry breaks – 40% (25 of 62)​

• The player who made the first ball after the break:
- Won the game in that same inning 70% of the time (153 of 220)​
- Won the game in a later inning 12% of the time (26 of 220)​
- Lost the game 19% of the time (41 of 220)​
[Note -- total games used here are 220 rather than 223 to eliminate the 3 games in which no ball was made after the break.]​

• Just one of these 13 matches went to hill/hill; the most lopsided was 9-2.

• The average minutes per game for all 13 matches was 6.3. For the matches that did not use a shot clock (Matches 1-8), the average was 6.5 Five of those 8 matches had no commercial breaks. For the matches that did use a time clock (Matches 9-13) the average was 6.2. All 5 of those matches had commercial breaks. In computing these averages, the elapsed time was measured from the lag until the winning ball was made (or conceded), so it includes time for racking and commercial breaks, if any. The commercial breaks were significant in the weekend matches, generally occurring after every 3 or 4 games in a match, and lasting about 3 minutes each.

• The match that was highest in average minutes per game, at 7.7 (with no commercial breaks), was Dominguez d. Styer 9-6. The match that was lowest in average minutes per game, at 4.5 (with commercial breaks), was Filler d. Shaw 10-3.

• Breaking fouls averaged 1 for every 9.3 games, other fouls 1 for every 2,4 games, and missed shots about 1 for every 2.6 games.

• One or more safeties were played in about 30% of all games and in 42% of games that were not B&Rs.

I'm curious how this average time per game compares to past events? I enjoyed the matches (when DAZN was working) but they did seem to take a very long time.
 
Great stats. Breaker won the game 50% tells you all you need to know. Having the break was not an advantage in this event. The 27% break and run percent is almoSt beyond belief. I will defend all the players by saying that they are not as bad as this break rule made them look. At least, two superstars met in the final, but the level of play did not befit the occasion.

i figured I would enjoy this slower, more tactical form of nine ball but I enjoyed this event less than any event on the 2022 Matchroom Tour so far. That said, I am keeping an open mind, for perhaps it will grow on me.

For now, however, this break rule experiment looks like it has made the game less exciting to watch.
Did you enjoy the 2021 International 9-Ball Open (also won by Ouschan)? 9-ball racked on the spot, break box 9" to each side of the long string, Diamond table with 4¼" corners, template rack, alternate breaks, 3-point rule, 40-sec. clock. Comparison based on the matches I tracked (223 games for the Euro event, 242 games for the International event):

Successful breaks: 61% Euro, 65% International​
Breaker won game: 50% Euro, 51% International​
Break and run games on all breaks: 27% Euro, 27% International​
Break and run games on successful breaks: 44% Euro, 42% International​
Games ending in one inning: 57% Euro, 53% International​
 
Thanks again for all your work.

Did you notice any time that the player was asked to break harder? All the matches I saw seemed to have no issue with that.

Also, were the golden breaks straight in or by a kiss?
Screen Shot 2022-08-15 at 2.51.40 PM.png

On the cuescore page, it shows that Tobias Bongers got a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. I'm not sure but I'm guessing that is for a soft break warning. That is the only one for the entire event showing on cuescore.
 
I'm curious how this average time per game compares to past events? I enjoyed the matches (when DAZN was working) but they did seem to take a very long time.
The matches I watched in this event without a shot clock averaged 6.5 minutes per game, ranging from 4.5 to 7.7. That was for 8 matches, 3 of which had long commercial breaks. The 5 matches I watched with a shot clock, all with long commercial breaks, averaged 6.2 minutes per game.

For comparison, here are some results from the matches I tracked at other recent 9-Ball events, all with a shot clock:
• 2022 UK Open (8 matches, long commercial breaks) -- 6.1​
• 2022 World Championship (11 matches, long commercial breaks) -- 6.0​
• 2022 DCC 9-Ball (11 matches, no commercial breaks) -- 4.7 [For the prior 5 years: 5.0, 5.2, 5.2, 4.8, 5.1]​
• 2021 International Open (15 matches, no commercial breaks) -- 5.9​
• 2021 World Championship (23 matches, long commercial breaks) -- 6.6​
 
Last edited:
Results got progressively worse. (They switched from templates to triangles on Saturday.)

Friday (77 games) -- Successful breaks 79%, Breaker won 60%, B&Rs 34%​
Saturday (83 games) -- Successful breaks 59%, Breaker won 46%, B&Rs 27%​
Sunday (63 games) -- Successful breaks 43%, Breaker won 44%, B&Rs 19%​
 
View attachment 656255
On the cuescore page, it shows that Tobias Bongers got a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. I'm not sure but I'm guessing that is for a soft break warning. That is the only one for the entire event showing on cuescore.
I heard his warning was for forfeiting his match. I also vaguely recall hearing his cues didn't arrive and he couldn't cope with borrowed cues.
 
Great stats. Breaker won the game 50% tells you all you need to know. Having the break was not an advantage in this event. The 27% break and run percent is almoSt beyond belief. I will defend all the players by saying that they are not as bad as this break rule made them look. At least, two superstars met in the final, but the level of play did not befit the occasion.

i figured I would enjoy this slower, more tactical form of nine ball but I enjoyed this event less than any event on the 2022 Matchroom Tour so far. That said, I am keeping an open mind, for perhaps it will grow on me.

For now, however, this break rule experiment looks like it has made the game less exciting to watch.
Stu notice how most of the players had their chin on or almost on the shaft when shooting... Guy
 
Sunday (63 games) -- Successful breaks 43%, Breaker won 44%, B&Rs 19%​

NICE...... This is how it should be. Can't wait to see the 4" pocket results, if they switch.

4-1/8" may be the sweet spot.....LOL
 
Consolidating some AtLarge stats for context.

Break and runs
Turning Stone: 30%
Derby City: 30%
Mosconi Cup: 30% (US 17% / Eur 41%)
WPC: 43%
UK Open: 40%
WPM: 36%
WCoP: 26%
EO: 27% (23% in the hand rack phase)

Breaker winning the game
Turning Stone: 63%
Derby City: 56%
Mosconi Cup: 61% (US 56% / Eur 66%)
WPC: 68%
UK Open: 66%
WPM: 62%
WCoP: 61%
EO: 50% (45% in the hand rack phases)

They do need to make sure breaker winning the game is over 50%. Maybe that's just the players needing more time with these rules.
 
Last edited:
Consolidating some AtLarge stats for context.

Break and runs
Turning Stone: 33%
Derby City: 33%
Mosconi Cup: 30% (US 17% / Eur 41%)
WPC: 43%
UK Open: 40%
WPM: 36%
WCoP: 26%
EO: 27% (23% in the hand rack phase)

Breaker winning the game
Turning Stone: 72%
Derby City: 56%
Mosconi Cup: 61% (US 56% / Eur 66%)
WPC: 68%
UK Open: 66%
WPM: 62%
WCoP: 61%
EO: 50% (44% in the hand rack phases)

They do need to make sure breaker winning the game is over 50%. Maybe that's just the players needing more time with these rules.
I see that these are all for the most recent of those events (all 2022 except 2021 MC). A few corrections: the Turning Stone numbers should be 30 and 63 (you picked up the match winners' numbers), the DCC B&R should be 30 instead of 33, and the EO breaker-win number for the triangle stage should be 45 instead of 44.
 
Back
Top