Break Stats -- 2024 European Open Pool Championship (9-Ball), August 2024

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some aggregate break statistics from the 2024 European Open Pool Championship played August 6-11, 2024 at the Esperanto Congress and Cultural Center in Fulda, Germany. Pay-per-view streaming was provided in the USA on DAZN. This was a 256-player 9-Ball event, produced by Matchroom Sport, with double elimination down to 64 players (32 on the winners' side and 32 on the one-loss side) and then single-elimination to the end. Mickey Krause won the tournament, defeating Johann Chua in the final match.

On the matches I watched, the commentators were Phil Yates, Michael McMullan, Jeremy Jones, and Karl Boyes; the referees were Marcel Eckardt, Ben Taylor-Fuente, Julian Roper, and some whose names I do not know. On the weekend, the announcer/interviewer was Abigail Davies and the MC was Tahir Hajat.

Conditions -- The conditions for the streamed matches included:
• Diamond 9-foot tables with 4" (or slightly smaller) corner pockets;​
• Simonis 860 Shark Grey cloth;​
• Aramith Tournament Black balls with a black-spots cue ball;​
• Magic Ball Rack racking template;​
• referee racks with the 9-ball on the foot spot and the 2-ball on one of the wings or in the back location;​
• winner breaks from behind the head string in a box approximately 8" to either side of the long string;​
• no illegal-break rule, but referees enforce a forceful-break requirement;​
• 30-second shot clock (60 sec. after the break or a push out), with one 30-sec. extension per player per rack;​
• foul on all balls;​
• 3-foul rule in effect (violation did not occur);​
• jump cues allowed;​
• all slop counts; and​
• lag for the break in each match.​

These stats are for all 16 matches (252 games) played on the "TV Table" from Thursday through Sunday -- 4 matches in the Qualification rounds on Thursday, 5 matches in the Last 64 and Last 32 rounds on Friday, and 7 matches played on the weekend. These 16 matches are listed here in the order in which they were played.

Thursday, August 8
1. Jayson Shaw defeated Darren Appleton 9-3​
2. Shane Van Boening d. Gary Wilson 9-7​
3. Imran Majid d. Phuong Nam Pham 9-4​
4. Joshua Filler d. Kostas Koukiadakis 9-5​

Friday, August 9
5. Chang Yu Lung d. Shaw 10-5 (Last 64)​
6. Francisco Sanchez-Ruiz d. Max Lechner 10-5 (Last 64)​
7. Filler d. Labinot Markaj 10-3 (Last 64)​
8. Van Boening d. Ramazan Akdag 10-6 (Last 32)​
9. Fedor Gorst d. Aleksa Pecelj 10-5 (Last 32)​

Saturday, August 10
10. Mustafa Alnar d. Filler 10-7 (Last 16)​
11. Skyler Woodward d. Gorst 10-9 (Last 16)​
12. Johann Chua d. Alnar 10-4 (Quarterfinal)​
13. Van Boening d. Sanchez-Ruiz 10-6 (Quarterfinal)​

Sunday, August 11
14. Chua d. Van Boening 11-5 (Semifinal)​
15. Mickey Krause d. Woodward 11-9 (Semifinal)​
16. Krause d. Chua 13-8 (Final)​

Overall results
Successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Match winners -- 72% (113 of 156)​
Match losers -- 64% (61 of 96)​
Total -- 69% (174 of 252)
Breaker won the game:
Match winners -- 62% (97 of 156)​
Match losers -- 33% (32 of 96)​
Total -- 51% (129 of 252)
Break-and-run games on all breaks:
Match winners -- 19% (30 of156)​
Match losers -- 10% (10 of 96)​
Total -- 16% (40 of 252)
Break-and-run games on successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Match winners -- 27% (30 of 113)​
Match losers -- 16% (10 of 61)​
Total -- 23% (40 of 174)

Here's a breakdown of the 252 games (for match winners and losers combined).

Breaker made at least one ball and did not foul:​
Breaker won the game: 104 (41% of the 252 games)​
Breaker lost the game: 70 (28%)​
Breaker fouled on the break:​
Breaker won the game: 7 (3%)​
Breaker lost the game: 17 (7%)​
Breaker broke dry (without fouling):​
Breaker won the game: 18 (7%)​
Breaker lost the game: 36 (14%)​
Therefore, whereas the breaker won 51% (129 of 252) of all games,​
He won 60% (104 of 174) of the games in which the break was successful (made at least one ball and did not foul).​
He won 32% (25 of 78) of the games in which the break was unsuccessful (fouled or dry).​

Break-and-run games -- The 40 break-and-run games represented 16% of all 252 games, 31% of the 129 games won by the breaker, and 23% of the 175 games in which the break was successful (made a ball and didn't foul).

The 40 break-and-run games consisted of one 3-pack (Filler), seven 2-packs (2 by Van Boening, 2 by Gorst, and 1 each by Woodward, Chang, and Chua), and 23 singles. No one in these 16 matches broke and ran more than 3 games in a row.

9-Balls on the break -- None in these 16 matches!
 
Last edited:
Miscellany from the data for the 2024 European Open Pool Championship (9-Ball):
[This relates only to the 16 streamed matches I watched, not to all matches in the event.]

• The most balls made on a single break was 3, done 11 times. The breaker won 6 of those games (3 by B&R).

• The average number of balls made on the break was 1.1 (this includes dry and fouled breaks). On successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul), the average was 1.4, and the distribution was 70% 1 ball, 24% 2 balls, and 6% 3 balls.

• Number of innings:
37% (93 of 252) of the games ended in one inning – 40 games on the breaker's first inning (B&Rs) and 53 games on the non-breaker's first inning.​
27% (67 of 252) of the games ended in the second inning.​
37% (92 of 252) of the games went beyond the non-breaker's second visit to the table. The game with the most visits to the table ended on the non-breaker's 13th visit.​

• 26% (66 of 252) of the games were run out by the player who was at the table following the break. These run-outs were:
- By the breaker after successful breaks (B&R games) – 23% (40 of 174)​
- By the non-breaker after fouls on the break – 58% (14 of 24)​
- By the non-breaker after dry breaks – 22% (12 of 54)​

• The player who made the first ball after the break:
- Won the game in that same inning 51% of the time (128 of 252)​
- Won the game in a later inning 19% of the time (48 of 252)​
- Lost the game 30% of the time (76 of 252)​

• The loser won an average of 5.6 games in the 9 races to 10 (excludes the shorter races to 9 on Thursday and the longer semifinals and final). The closest match was one that went to hill/hill (in a race to 10). The most lopsided matches were one at 9-3 and one at 10-3.

• The average minutes per game for all 16 matches was 6.8. The elapsed time was measured from the lag until the winning ball was made, so it includes time for racking and commercial breaks. Commercial breaks were taken only in the Last 16 and subsequent matches. They were significant in those matches, generally occurring after every 3 games in a match, and lasting about 3 minutes each. The 9 matches on Thursday and Friday that had no commercial breaks averaged 6.7 minutes per game. The 7 matches on the weekend that had commercial breaks averaged 7.0 minutes per game, or an estimated average of 6.4 minutes per game if there had been no commercial breaks.

• The match that was highest in average minutes per game, at 9.4, was Majid d. Phuong. The match lowest in average minutes per game was Van Boening d. Wilson at 4.5. Neither of those matches had commercial breaks.

• Breaking fouls averaged 1 for every 10.5 games, other fouls 1 for every 4.9 games, and missed shots about 1 for every 1.3 games.

• One or more safeties were played in about 50% of all games and in 59% of games that were not B&Rs.
 
Last edited:
It is interesting that the "breaker won the game" percentage was only 51%. This means that for those who were not breaking well, the break was a disadvantage, as they were less than 50% to win from their own break.

Also, the percentage is boosted relative to all the players in the tournament because most of those breaks were by the top half or maybe even the top quarter of all players.
 
It is interesting that the "breaker won the game" percentage was only 51%. This means that for those who were not breaking well, the break was a disadvantage, as they were less than 50% to win from their own break.

Also, the percentage is boosted relative to all the players in the tournament because most of those breaks were by the top half or maybe even the top quarter of all players.
Yeah. Very interesting stats. 51% breaker wins game means basically it didn’t matter who broke! First time I’ve seen that for a while. Probably a good thing, means matchroom found a way to stop it being a procession based on breaker controlling the game ?
 
During Archers prime years, B&R percentages for the top players were in the 20% +range.
Today, with the 4'' pockets and 9 ball on the spot, that probably is the difference, why they are below 20%.
 
It is interesting that the "breaker won the game" percentage was only 51%. This means that for those who were not breaking well, the break was a disadvantage, as they were less than 50% to win from their own break. ...
A breaker-won-game percentage that low has happened a number of times, perhaps most recently at the 2023 Mosconi Cup. As for breaking well vs. not breaking well, post #1 shows that the percentage was 60% when the break was successful and 32% when it was fouled or dry.
 
Last edited:
During Archers prime years, B&R percentages for the top players were in the 20% +range.
Today, with the 4'' pockets and 9 ball on the spot, that probably is the difference, why they are below 20%.
The 16% figure here for B&Rs is low, even for today's Matchroom events. But we may see more such results. It was 19% at the UK Open (for the matches I tracked) 3 months ago, with corners apparently slightly under 4". And some people said that was also the size of the pockets for this European Open. For last year's European Open, with 4" corners, it was 24%.
 
Here are some aggregate break statistics from the 2024 European Open Pool Championship played August 6-11, 2024 at the Esperanto Congress and Cultural Center in Fulda, Germany. Pay-per-view streaming was provided in the USA on DAZN. This was a 256-player 9-Ball event, produced by Matchroom Sport, with double elimination down to 64 players (32 on the winners' side and 32 on the one-loss side) and then single-elimination to the end. Mickey Krause won the tournament, defeating Johann Chua in the final match.

On the matches I watched, the commentators were Phil Yates, Michael McMullan, Jeremy Jones, and Karl Boyes; the referees were Marcel Eckardt, Ben Taylor-Fuente, Julian Roper, and some whose names I do not know. On the weekend, the announcer/interviewer was Abigail Davies and the MC was Tahir Hajat.

Conditions -- The conditions for the streamed matches included:
• Diamond 9-foot tables with 4" (or slightly smaller) corner pockets;​
• Simonis 860 Shark Grey cloth;​
• Aramith Tournament Black balls with a black-spots cue ball;​
• Magic Ball Rack racking template;​
• referee racks with the 9-ball on the foot spot and the 2-ball on one of the wings or in the back location;​
• winner breaks from behind the head string in a box approximately 8" to either side of the long string;​
• no illegal-break rule, but referees enforce a forceful-break requirement;​
• 30-second shot clock (60 sec. after the break or a push out), with one 30-sec. extension per player per rack;​
• foul on all balls;​
• 3-foul rule in effect (violation did not occur);​
• jump cues allowed;​
• all slop counts; and​
• lag for the break in each match.​

These stats are for all 16 matches (252 games) played on the "TV Table" from Thursday through Sunday -- 4 matches in the Qualification rounds on Thursday, 5 matches in the Last 64 and Last 32 rounds on Friday, and 7 matches played on the weekend. These 16 matches are listed here in the order in which they were played.

Thursday, August 8
1. Jayson Shaw defeated Darren Appleton 9-3​
2. Shane Van Boening d. Gary Wilson 9-7​
3. Imran Majid d. Phuong Nam Pham 9-4​
4. Joshua Filler d. Kostas Koukiadakis 9-5​

Friday, August 9
5. Chang Yu Lung d. Shaw 10-5 (Last 64)​
6. Francisco Sanchez-Ruiz d. Max Lechner 10-5 (Last 64)​
7. Filler d. Labinot Markaj 10-3 (Last 64)​
8. Van Boening d. Ramazan Akdag 10-6 (Last 32)​
9. Fedor Gorst d. Aleksa Pecelj 10-5 (Last 32)​

Saturday, August 10
10. Mustafa Alnar d. Filler 10-7 (Last 16)​
11. Skyler Woodward d. Gorst 10-9 (Last 16)​
12. Johann Chua d. Alnar 10-4 (Quarterfinal)​
13. Van Boening d. Sanchez-Ruiz 10-6 (Quarterfinal)​

Sunday, August 11
14. Chua d. Van Boening 11-5 (Semifinal)​
15. Mickey Krause d. Woodward 11-9 (Semifinal)​
16. Krause d. Chua 13-8 (Final)​

Overall results
Successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Match winners -- 72% (113 of 156)​
Match losers -- 64% (61 of 96)​
Total -- 69% (174 of 252)
Breaker won the game:
Match winners -- 62% (97 of 156)​
Match losers -- 33% (32 of 96)​
Total -- 51% (129 of 252)
Break-and-run games on all breaks:
Match winners -- 19% (30 of156)​
Match losers -- 10% (10 of 96)​
Total -- 16% (40 of 252)
Break-and-run games on successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul):
Match winners -- 27% (30 of 113)​
Match losers -- 16% (10 of 61)​
Total -- 23% (40 of 174)

Here's a breakdown of the 252 games (for match winners and losers combined).

Breaker made at least one ball and did not foul:​
Breaker won the game: 104 (41% of the 252 games)​
Breaker lost the game: 70 (28%)​
Breaker fouled on the break:​
Breaker won the game: 7 (3%)​
Breaker lost the game: 17 (7%)​
Breaker broke dry (without fouling):​
Breaker won the game: 18 (7%)​
Breaker lost the game: 36 (14%)​
Therefore, whereas the breaker won 51% (129 of 252) of all games,​
He won 60% (104 of 174) of the games in which the break was successful (made at least one ball and did not foul).​
He won 32% (25 of 78) of the games in which the break was unsuccessful (fouled or dry).​

Break-and-run games -- The 40 break-and-run games represented 16% of all 252 games, 31% of the 129 games won by the breaker, and 23% of the 175 games in which the break was successful (made a ball and didn't foul).

The 40 break-and-run games consisted of one 3-pack (Filler), seven 2-packs (2 by Van Boening, 2 by Gorst, and 1 each by Woodward, Chang, and Chua), and 23 singles. No one in these 16 matches broke and ran more than 3 games in a row.

9-Balls on the break -- None in these 16 matches!
I just want to thank you, for all of the time and effort that you put into bringing us these stats.
 
The 16% figure here for B&Rs is low, even for today's Matchroom events. But we may see more such results. It was 19% at the UK Open (for the matches I tracked) 3 months ago, with corners apparently slightly under 4". And some people said that was also the size of the pockets for this European Open. For last year's European Open, with 4" corners, it was 24%.

Possible explanation for drop to <20% B&R this year is cos last year European Open (EO) had 25 x800 out of 32 players i.e. 78% top players in the 16 matches streamed while this year EO only had 20 out of 32 (63% top players)
 
Possible explanation for drop to <20% B&R this year is cos last year European Open (EO) had 25 x800 out of 32 players i.e. 78% top players in the 16 matches streamed while this year EO only had 20 out of 32 (63% top players)
Good thought, spartan. So I calculated the B&R percentages for the 800s and non-800s in each event. For 2023, though, I found only 6, not 7, of the 32 player spots with non-800s (Immonen, Melling, Georgiev, Souquet, and Styer twice). I used their current ratings rather than last year's, so maybe that accounts for it. Or maybe I just overlooked one. Anyway ................

2023 B&Rs -- 15% for the non-800s, 26% for the 800s, 24% total​
2024 B&Rs -- 11% for the non-800s, 18% for the 800s, 16% total​
So it wasn't just the presence of more non-800s in those 16 matches this year that accounted for the drop below 20%. Interestingly, Shaw, Van Boening, and Filler all won their streamed matches in the qualifying rounds on Thursday. But, in aggregate, they had only 1 B&R in 27 breaks. Not a good start for that stat. Excluding those 3 matches, the 800s (in just 17 player appearances) were at 21% for Friday through Sunday.
 
Based on the run out percentage after making the first ball of the rack, players performed a bit better this event than in the Uk Open (51% vs 46%) but not as well as last years European Open (57%). It appears the break was a particular challenge in this event.
 
Good thought, spartan. So I calculated the B&R percentages for the 800s and non-800s in each event. For 2023, though, I found only 6, not 7, of the 32 player spots with non-800s (Immonen, Melling, Georgiev, Souquet, and Styer twice). I used their current ratings rather than last year's, so maybe that accounts for it. Or maybe I just overlooked one. Anyway ................

2023 B&Rs -- 15% for the non-800s, 26% for the 800s, 24% total​
2024 B&Rs -- 11% for the non-800s, 18% for the 800s, 16% total​
So it wasn't just the presence of more non-800s in those 16 matches this year that accounted for the drop below 20%. Interestingly, Shaw, Van Boening, and Filler all won their streamed matches in the qualifying rounds on Thursday. But, in aggregate, they had only 1 B&R in 27 breaks. Not a good start for that stat. Excluding those 3 matches, the 800s (in just 17 player appearances) were at 21% for Friday through Sunday.

The 7th non-800/ sub 800/800- player last year was Fortunski. He joined 800 club this year after making final in UK Open

So by and large,
800+ >20% B&R
800- <20% B&R
😀
 
The 7th non-800/ sub 800/800- player last year was Fortunski. He joined 800 club this year after making final in UK Open

So by and large,
800+ >20% B&R
800- <20% B&R
😀
Fortunski had 4 B&Rs on 9 breaks in his losing match with Filler last year! Moving him to the non-800s in 2023 revises it to:

2023 B&Rs -- 20% for the non-800s, 25% for the 800s, 24% total​
2024 B&Rs -- 11% for the non-800s, 18% for the 800s, 16% total​

[ah the effects of small numbers!]
 
Fortunski had 4 B&Rs on 9 breaks in his losing match with Filler last year! Moving him to the non-800s in 2023 revises it to:

2023 B&Rs -- 20% for the non-800s, 25% for the 800s, 24% total​
2024 B&Rs -- 11% for the non-800s, 18% for the 800s, 16% total​

[ah the effects of small numbers!]
Maybe I missed it, but do you have balls missed stats?
 
Maybe I missed it, but do you have balls missed stats?
Near the bottom of the Miscellany post (post #2) I have the overall games per miss of 1.3. For comparison, it was 1 per 2.5 games in the recent SVB/Gorst challenge match. Note that there is some subjectivity in what is or isn't a miss. So my count on that stat may be different from someone else's (Matchroom's, for example).
 
Fortunski had 4 B&Rs on 9 breaks in his losing match with Filler last year! Moving him to the non-800s in 2023 revises it to:

2023 B&Rs -- 20% for the non-800s, 25% for the 800s, 24% total​
2024 B&Rs -- 11% for the non-800s, 18% for the 800s, 16% total​

[ah the effects of small numbers!]
Maybe I missed it, but do you have balls missed stats?
Near the bottom of the Miscellany post (post #2) I have the overall games per miss of 1.3. For comparison, it was 1 per 2.5 games in the recent SVB/Gorst challenge match. Note that there is some subjectivity in what is or isn't a miss. So my count on that stat may be different from someone else's (Matchroom's, for example).
I thought it was a miss every 4 games in tfe Shane/Fedor match? I could have misread it.
 
... I thought it was a miss every 4 games in tfe Shane/Fedor match? I could have misread it.
You read it correctly. But the 4.0 and 4.1 figures are misses related to each player's number of games at the table, which does not include the B&R games of their opponent. The 2.5 figure is total games divided by total misses.
 
You read it correctly. But the 4.0 and 4.1 figures are misses related to each player's number of games at the table, which does not include the B&R games of their opponent. The 2.5 figure is total games divided by total misses.
Got it! Thanks!
 
Back
Top