Players usually have an option to bid on themselves or at least buy half of themselves from the high bidder. Beyond that, it has nothing to do with the players. It is a side arrangement for the added entertainment of the spectators. It would be different if it cut into their money.I feel Calcuttas are bad for the game. Chops often occur as Calcutta money is equal to or greater then trnmnt prize money.
Also players are "working" for nothing .Take 15 to 20 % of the calcutta money and spread it out to everyone paying a entry fee.
They have that option. I've seen GOOD players go dirt cheap and not have the $ to buy half themselves. Too bad so sad.All players should share in the Calcutta as without them there is nothing to auction. Now maybe you see the point of my arguement?