note to straight pool event promoters: that 2nd camera? please don't use it.
it's Never more useful than the one at the foot of the table. it's mildly amusing to see someone rack the balls from the front rather than their back, maybe, but do you really need the extra logistics for that? no. and it is Never a better view of the game than the one where the action is: the foot.
seriously, in hundreds of hours of video, i can't recall One instance where the camera at the head offered anything i couldn't see better from the foot, and literally Hundreds where it was used to frustrate what anyone interested in 14.1 would want to see.
and while you're at it, ditch the hyperactive camera ops; we really don't need to see extreme closeups following Thomas Engert's bed head as he ponders the next shot (which you're not letting us see). we want to see the table and him hitting the shot. rapid cutting between vantage points isn't exciting; it's disorienting and stupid.
one camera at the foot of the table is Better. overhead if you Really have to. but less really is more in this case.
it's Never more useful than the one at the foot of the table. it's mildly amusing to see someone rack the balls from the front rather than their back, maybe, but do you really need the extra logistics for that? no. and it is Never a better view of the game than the one where the action is: the foot.
seriously, in hundreds of hours of video, i can't recall One instance where the camera at the head offered anything i couldn't see better from the foot, and literally Hundreds where it was used to frustrate what anyone interested in 14.1 would want to see.
and while you're at it, ditch the hyperactive camera ops; we really don't need to see extreme closeups following Thomas Engert's bed head as he ponders the next shot (which you're not letting us see). we want to see the table and him hitting the shot. rapid cutting between vantage points isn't exciting; it's disorienting and stupid.
one camera at the foot of the table is Better. overhead if you Really have to. but less really is more in this case.