randyg said:
Some of you guys have missed the entire meaning in this story.
I'm a little confused by your statement.
Originaly, the meaning was a question of doubt:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was reading an article by the "Monk" inwhich he says his top female student who played a lot in New England area was a 100 ball runner, but most hard to believe was she ran 80 or 90 balls without contacting a rail with the cue ball. I have a high run of 95/80 and countless 40/50s so its not envy that inspires this letter but instead how valid this could be. What are some of your thoughts.
Now, it said she could "run" 100 without hitting a rail.
If I said that, would you think it was a practice drill I was talking about?
If it came out that it was a drill, a set up routine, would you be as impressed?
Then it turned on us that it was disrespectful of her....as a woman.
Nobody doubts her ability in the least, but the statements made don't represent the actual feat.
If Monk said she could run the crap out of a practice drill, it would not raise as much interest as a 100 ball run in 14.1 without a rail.
That is the real meaning of all this conversation.
Not to lessen her high run in a practice drill.
Hats off, cudos, or whatever props mean the most to her. ( or Monk ).
I'd be more impressed in a real run though.