Then back to the sacred question: Why is conjuring and performing to an apparition easier and more precise than determining what your shot is and shooting it per the requirements at hand?
CTE AIMIING AND BANKING AT A PROFESSIONAL LEVEL
- Thread starter Low500
- Start date
That would cause a CTE error.
All bark. This is the attitude of the typical C-level pool player. Makes grandioso claims and never backs anything up.
Could be. Pool is a very precise craft and as long as the pool is credible, doesn't matter to me who claims what. One of my motivations is playing perfect; flawless; for as long as I choose. Let you know how that works out. 
I don't know anyone that does that.
You're a step ahead of me - I don't even know what that is.
pj <- or what language
chgo
I had to recheck the title of the thread, but it does specifically call out CTE. Wouldn't that be a decent enough indication that commenting on CTE is ok, if not expected...?
I wasnt quoting or responding to the original post. I was responding to 8pack and i felt there was no reason to mention CTE in his post. If you read his post i quoted you would probably agree.
JB mentioned imaginary balls elsewhere - AT me. I was referring to CTE in that manner. The apparition of edge line and center line in separate eyes willing the shooter to hit any shot correctly. Supernatural.
Ever tried it?
Doing the new ProCT thing is too far from my way of sighting which oddly enough, works. About the best I could do is line up per the instructions and guess at the shot.
So you really don't know much about CTE or how to use it properly. Seems you are just here to use big words and troll the day away. Sound about right. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that, in fact it's pretty normal for the aiming forum.
Is that the only angle you got? For all this perception talk, you sure ain't got much.
Here's some science that seems to escape you guys:
If you do not first establish the metrics of a shot, all attempts to shoot it will be guesswork.
I mean seriously, throw away the protractors. You only need 15, 30, 45, and 60 and those you can tell just by looking. ????
Just seeing if you were man enough to admit being an aiming forum troll, guess not.
Do you use a protractor to aim? I don't know anyone that does so please start another thread describing that method.
Yes you can easily tell 15,30,45,and 60 by looking and that is all that's needed
I am curious as to your method to do this, please describe in detail
Aiming troll? I show al the noobs that want to know how to line up the points, find your shot line, anything short of their eyes glazing over. I'm not the one flooding this forum.
I've already mentioned this stuff in as much detail as it requires. You're welcome to go dig it up. Hit up PJ. He got pics even.
Complains about too much CTE stuff flooding the forum but won't start a new thread on his own aiming method.
Oh the irony. Can't make this stuff up.
I see no relevance here. Contact geometry is simple and requires no lengthy dissertation.
Well you've mentioned it about 500 times, might as well have it's own thread so it won't constantly disrupt the other threads. Oh it's been long understood that there will be no long discussion about your aiming method, whatever that might be.