CTE aiming video
- Thread starter gazman100
- Start date
Copyright
Well anything anyone does after Stan has laid the groundwork would be riding on a fence of copyright issues. I wouldn't want to be found standing on the wrong side of it.
Well anything anyone does after Stan has laid the groundwork would be riding on a fence of copyright issues. I wouldn't want to be found standing on the wrong side of it.
I doubt that copyright issue.
The answer may lie some place in most aiming systems are hands on instruction.
randyg
Randyg,
As an author yourself you understand the copyright issues and I agree with you on both counts. I cant see anything being gained by anyone else explaining what Stan has done unless he just finds a way to greatly simplify it or completely change it all together. Then is it CTE? It would have to be something all its own.
Aiming systems / techniques cannot be copyrighted. The copy within the material that explains it can be.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
Pretty simple really, Stan is the MASTER. No one and i mean no one, knows and understands CTE like Stan. That being said other instructors teach similar versions of it.
Thanks. Cookie Man!
It's not rocket science, though. A powerful set of circumstances and opportunity and I must say a lot of resolve on my part allowed me to be in the right mindset at a perfect time to put all the pieces of the puzzle together.
Even though DVD1 presents the system, DVD2, which is right around the corner, will lay out all of the puzzle pieces for anyone to logically assemble for creating their own experiences with another dimension in aiming.
Stan Shuffett
correct
That is exactly right and knowing that if someone were to use the same basic wording to describe that said method then they are infringing on the copyright. This is the fence I was describing in my first post.
So it would be hard for a guy......not Stan...to come out with a cte video....he might need a bunch of new ways to describe it.
Now if he came out with something entirely different none of it applies.
That is exactly right and knowing that if someone were to use the same basic wording to describe that said method then they are infringing on the copyright. This is the fence I was describing in my first post.
So it would be hard for a guy......not Stan...to come out with a cte video....he might need a bunch of new ways to describe it.
Now if he came out with something entirely different none of it applies.
Nice!
I think you might be getting my sense of humor. I knew exactly what you meant with your puzzle post. seriously though, I'm pretty sure I will get one. I like to hear what you have to say.
Good luck with the sales.
CTE simply does not work if you get directly behind a physical CTE line. There MUST be an offset. In CTE there are 2 offsets that connect with the pockets.
For example, with left cuts you have A and B that can be coupled with a CTE sight line. Those 2 precise visual perceptions represent specific visual alignments that lead to pocketing every left cut on the table to some hole and it's usually the one you're after.
In the same manner you can NOT get directly behind an aim line.
So, to answer your question in a simplified way, the aim line allows one to establish a proper visual offset to a CTE perception.
Stan Shuffett
I got good center line visual,good stroke( was told by lot of people and even 2 professional players that I've met in my life) which felt good hearing from a professional players. My balance is good foot work is good. Idk what it but I keep going back to original Hal Houle system way Hal taught me when I was in California visiting a friends. I don't wanna give up Pro1/CTE but it seem like very good system but if I can't get it down, then maybe I need to move on.
With what you describe that you learned from Hal, I will bet you are already seeing your aim lines from an offset resulting in left and right sweeps.
Stan Shuffett