cte/pro1

It's a perceptual matter not really a shot angle matter.
This will be shown in DVD2.

Stan Shuffett
So its a matter of creating the rite perception?If it has nothing to do with the shot angle ,how would you go about creating the rite perception?Was this covered at all in dvd1?

Anthony
 
So its a matter of creating the rite perception?If it has nothing to do with the shot angle ,how would you go about creating the rite perception?Was this covered at all in dvd1?

Anthony

The system is just fine on DVD1. There has only been one update. All the visual info is there.
There will be more perceptual info on 2 but the system is not changing.

Stan Shuffett
 
Yes - everything was covered in DVD1.

I don't think angles at all. Significantly different angles can have the same perceptions or visuals.
 
I happen to think it is a very good thing but to each their own. Like anything - it takes work but there is a payoff.

So what your saying is that some angles have the same line up and you try to adjust to create the rite potting angle.(on some shots)
 
Thank you for your opinion. I have been very involved with the CTE "debate" for many, many years, so I think I have as much right as anybody to share my perspectives.

... because I put a tremendous amount of time and effort into creating it, and because many people appreciate the perspectives and resources I provide.

You've been told it's wrong and misleading!
... but not how or why. But that's OK. People are allowed to have different perspectives and opinions without having to explain themselves.

Regards,
Dave[/QUOTE]

I know it's wrong and misleading! I told you that over a year ago. So have many others. Now Stan has come forward and told you. But you insist on putting wrong information out there! We all know your perspective on CTE/Pro-One, and it isn't in a positive light! Maybe you should spend some time finding your own Resources (not someone elses which is the case more than not,) rather than trying to mislead others with your perspective!
 
Same objective perceptions same movements



Stan Shuffett

1.Same objective (2 Different angles)
2.Same movements (2 different angles)

Your not Gerry...lol

I don think you can create a different angle by doing the same movements.
If you can ,how?
Sorry for being difficult but you ask for it.:p

Anthony
 
Example, if you have a million shots that all fall under an outside A alignment and not one of those million shots have the same degree of cut angle. The system will visually organize all those shots into one visual image (category) that will be burnt onto your brain along with how to make them (outside A pivot then shoot).

This happens for every pro1 alignment. You now have made 10’s of millions of shots and organised them into cte/pro1 alignments. You pretty much have patterned and organized all shots possible on the table into a simple system.

Any movement of a ball will change your body alignment as little as maybe .02 of a degree which even can be done by standing in the same position.

This is not easy to explain but i am trying :wink:

Its not easy so stop...:D And there's not that many shots on the table.
(maybe 8 to 10)

Anthony
 
Last edited:
Well if there are know adjustments why is that on a shot that is 45 degree's
and a shot that is 50 degree's, Neither angle is known to you but you make them both with the same movements.I would think you would come up 5 degree's short.
Explain to me where the 5 degree's came from .Is knowing where the pocket is influencing the shot in some way.

Dammit sounds like i wanna argue but I don't.:grin-square:

Anthony
 
First let me say I respect Dr. Dave and enjoy his website tremendously. I have read through it many times and have picked up some real gems.

Regarding CTE: I tried to learn it off what was on Dave's site and had zero success. I bought Stan's DVD and my shot making has increased tremendously in a short time. (and I was a good shot maker before CTE)

I feel I am not qualified yet to try and point out errors so I will just share my experience.
 
Anthony, the ctel moves ever so slightly inside as the degree of cut gets higher.This means your alignment will also move inside as the degree changes. As for determining what alignment to use, that comes with experience.

So your saying you go off of what the degree the cut is ?I dont think this is how it was presented on Stans first dvd.But I do agree on your alignment moving.
 
Well if there are know adjustments why is that on a shot that is 45 degree's
and a shot that is 50 degree's, Neither angle is known to you but you make them both with the same movements.I would think you would come up 5 degree's short.
Explain to me where the 5 degree's came from .Is knowing where the pocket is influencing the shot in some way.

Dammit sounds like i wanna argue but I don't.:grin-square:

Anthony

FWIW
Spidy did a clip where he covered half the table and was potting balls from all over the table several years ago using Hal's one tip over and pivot system of CTE.
 

Attachments

  • cte.jpg
    cte.jpg
    80.9 KB · Views: 1,123
FWIW
Spidy did a clip where he covered half the table and was potting balls from all over the table several years ago using Hal's one tip over and pivot system of CTE.

I remember the video,Spidey just don't miss.He need's no aiming system.:smile:
 
This is the same argument CTE gets over and over. There is a reason the 2d drawings are not an accurate representation of the system. It is based on visual representation, something you only get standing behind a shot. Every CB/OB/pocket combination has a unique visual, resulting in a single and very exact shot line. This can be attained with a handful of objective visuals combined with a consistent left or right sweep. This can only truly be understood by shooting a few thousand shots and your mind and body "get it".
 
Back
Top