Well, like some have said, the tips make a big difference, the ferrules and joints and cue weight.
So you say Scruggs hits like 8 or something but your favorite tip is a Moori medium. Someone else wants a Sniper tip and another guy wants a Triangle tip. The next guy puts a break tip on it. Now you have to rate the tips too.
Some people love Ivory ferrules and some don't count for them, so they buy their cues to their liking.
The system just isn't going to work unless the whole system is standardized
with the same tips, ferrules, weight ect.
Also I think the same person, or group of experts will have to be the one to do the testing on all the cues.
If Joe says the Meucci is 8, the guy Bob in the bar says no way, it's a 4, and others say something different, then the system is crap, and worthless.
And in my opinion you should rate it as energy transfer efficiency.
You apply X amount of energy and measure the amount of energy transferred to the cue ball. People have tried this system with break cues.
I seen a video somewhere where they tested break cue efficiency by pointing the cue downwards, from a known height, then they drop it on a hard surface, and they used a high speed camera to film it. So if they drop the cue from 20 inches for example and it bounced back up about 10 inches, then they used some formula to get the efficiency. I guess maybe that is 50%, I am no physicist. If they drop another cue from 20 inches and it bounced 15 inches, then that cue is more powerful for a break cue.
Take 100,000 players from beginners to pros and they say they think this or that cue is 4 or 5 isn't going to work.
So you say Scruggs hits like 8 or something but your favorite tip is a Moori medium. Someone else wants a Sniper tip and another guy wants a Triangle tip. The next guy puts a break tip on it. Now you have to rate the tips too.
Some people love Ivory ferrules and some don't count for them, so they buy their cues to their liking.
The system just isn't going to work unless the whole system is standardized
with the same tips, ferrules, weight ect.
Also I think the same person, or group of experts will have to be the one to do the testing on all the cues.
If Joe says the Meucci is 8, the guy Bob in the bar says no way, it's a 4, and others say something different, then the system is crap, and worthless.
And in my opinion you should rate it as energy transfer efficiency.
You apply X amount of energy and measure the amount of energy transferred to the cue ball. People have tried this system with break cues.
I seen a video somewhere where they tested break cue efficiency by pointing the cue downwards, from a known height, then they drop it on a hard surface, and they used a high speed camera to film it. So if they drop the cue from 20 inches for example and it bounced back up about 10 inches, then they used some formula to get the efficiency. I guess maybe that is 50%, I am no physicist. If they drop another cue from 20 inches and it bounced 15 inches, then that cue is more powerful for a break cue.
Take 100,000 players from beginners to pros and they say they think this or that cue is 4 or 5 isn't going to work.