Cue ID

[SlateHumper]

I would appreciate any help IDing this cue
length: 57.5"
shaft: 12mm standard taper
Farrel: phenolic
forearm: rosewood
wrap: nylon
ss to phenolic piloted joint 5/16 x 14 brass pin to brass insert
no markings. looks like maybe from the late 60's ?
Thanks, Dave

 

[cuenut]

Looks alot like a Rich Q to me. What do you other guys have to say?

 

[BHQ]

I would appreciate any help IDing this cue
length: 57.5"
shaft: 12mm standard taper
Farrel: phenolic
forearm: rosewood
wrap: nylon
ss to phenolic piloted joint 5/16 x 14 brass pin to brass insert
no markings. looks like maybe from the late 60's ?
Thanks, Dave

hi dave, i just refinished a cue almost identical to that one. everyone seemd to think it was a RICH Q , here and on easy pool tutor

 

[pawnmon]

Very likely a Rich. I've owned many Rich cues over the years and this one's a dead ringer.

 

[SlateHumper]

thanks!

Thanks for the feedback. I had Sherm look at it and he he suggested Rich also. I'm kicking around the idea of selling it but no clue of the value. Again, thanks alot. btw... nice work stix

 

[BHQ]

hi dave, i just refinished a cue almost identical to that one. everyone seemd to think it was a RICH Q , here and on easy pool tutor

SOLD FOR CHEAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $75

 

[Hunter]

The guy who could tell you for sure is Mike (mikewalsh411@comcast.net). It initially looks like a Rich, but Doc Fry also did very similiar cues. He was a friend of Abe Rich. The cue would be worth more if it's a Fry. Chances are it's a Rich, which is also a fine cue, but I would check with Mike, as he is a consumate Doc fry collector...

Steve

 

[Jeffrey Gale]

The pilot on the shaft looks the same, and this is a Rich made in 1971.