I'm just wondering that since most of the professional players can actually play with just about any cue that you put in their hands, if it might not be a better idea for cue makers to sponsor lesser players.
And no, I don't need a sponsor as I a have what I think is the best playing cue in the world. That's not boasting, it's just a conclusion until I find something better.
I was just thinking that if professional players can overcome most any idiosyncrasies of a cue, wouldn't the cue makers be better off sponsoring lesser players who can't overcome most any idiosyncrasies of a cue?
I suppose that professional players have a finer taste for what suits them best but shouldn't the cue makers be building cues that fit the average player? If you say that's low deflection cues, so be it.
I also suppose that the cue makers wouldn't get the name recognition association that comes with sponsoring a professional player and maybe I just answered my own question but I think not.
In summary, I'm wondering if a cue maker would get better feedback from sponsoring average players than from professional players?
Especially since average players have greater needs and greater deficiencies than do professional players.
Perhaps the average player would misdiagnose the problem with the cue?
JoeyA
And no, I don't need a sponsor as I a have what I think is the best playing cue in the world. That's not boasting, it's just a conclusion until I find something better.
I was just thinking that if professional players can overcome most any idiosyncrasies of a cue, wouldn't the cue makers be better off sponsoring lesser players who can't overcome most any idiosyncrasies of a cue?
I suppose that professional players have a finer taste for what suits them best but shouldn't the cue makers be building cues that fit the average player? If you say that's low deflection cues, so be it.
I also suppose that the cue makers wouldn't get the name recognition association that comes with sponsoring a professional player and maybe I just answered my own question but I think not.
In summary, I'm wondering if a cue maker would get better feedback from sponsoring average players than from professional players?
Especially since average players have greater needs and greater deficiencies than do professional players.
Perhaps the average player would misdiagnose the problem with the cue?
JoeyA