custom cue makers

price

drivermaker said:
Now as far as I'm concerned, this is a good attitude in business and toward your cues. I think you'd start worrying about yourself and deteriorating skills if uncaught mistakes became the norm. EVERY cuemaker says the "hit" of their cue is different than the others and makes theirs stand out from the rest. Even Chris mentioned it about his cues, between a SW and a Meucci, just right. And I'm sure yours have a distinctive feel. So, that's a given on each of them. The rest of the job becomes the aesthetics, you can't stop at one or the other. A great looking cue that feels and plays like a piece of crap is no good either, it has to be a complete job. Otherwise, start knocking money OFF, not adding money on. If a cuemaker out and out f*#ks up with a clearly visible mistake, SOMEBODY has to pay the price, and it shouldn't be the buyer. Take money off if it can't be fixed and see what the buyer wants to do. Mistakes should never be rewarded with a full price.


I will not to be rewarded for mistakes. My seconds are in my game room or have been cut up on the band saw.

blud
 
Ken_4fun said:
I have used Phillipi cues, the are certainly okay. My best playing cue is by far is a PFD cue. I have Black, Palmer, Muecci, Hagan, Gilbert, Rambow, DP and just picked up a new Shurtz.

The Hagan cue is awesome hitting cue, I cannot get out of my head why this guy isnt making cues.......what a waste.

What I have seen out of Southwest cues are that quality is marginal at best, and play good. The price is okay, If the wait is legitiment, I tend to think is some kind of scam.

What the hell is up with Bill Hagan?

Regards
ken


marginal quality of southwest cues?i had lori make one the same as one of my friends original SW's that is over 20yrs old,my cue is identicle in every demension to his,overall length,length of shafts,length of butts and wraps,right now if have 3 SW,s that i am selling for a friend and same thing,they are identicle,two are jerry era and one is lori era,how can that be marginal.i have owned many of the cues that have been mentioned in this post and have not seen the quality of work of SW consistantly from any of them.the closest would be black boar,lori has every shaft and butt weighted to the exact gram,not ounce,gram,btw my shafts weight 28 grams each.nobody is more meticulous than SW when producing a cue that is why each one is serial numbered,by this number they can tell exactly what you have and build extra shafts or joint protectors and have them match exactly and also provent conterfeiting.

bill hagan is another story,he was from miamisburg ohio,about ten minutes from where i live,at our local pool hall there are a few stories about why he disapered,don't know whether to believe them or not,if you are looking for a hagan cue my friend has a pristine one he may part with.
 
Donald A. Purdy said:
I also might add, JimBo, what does your post have to do with Phillippi's cue making abilities?? You ever see anybody put more inlays than Ernie of Gina?
There are 590 inlays in the last one I saw. Only $8,500 five years ago. What's your point, you don't like Phillippi cues. Fine. How well does he build a cue? That was the question.
Purdman

Well, I might add that he asked about resale and about certain cuemakers and how they have built up their good names in the industry, why they had wait lists and why their cues got the resale prices they do. My post was just giving the opinion shared by many people, collectors, players and even other cue makers. Again I am sorry that you don't agree with this opinion, and you are entitled to your opinion, I can't argue that the cues play good or bad, it's personal preference. I can speak on the cue designs that I have seen and I did. I never said I don't like Phillippi cues, I just gave my opinion about why they have poor resale and why I wouldn't buy one. Also as far as who puts the most inlays in?? What does that have to do with anything? I know of many cue makers who put more inlays into cues, but inlays doesn't translate into GOOD in my eyes.

Jim
 
JimBo said:
Well, I might add that he asked about resale and about certain cuemakers and how they have built up their good names in the industry, why they had wait lists and why their cues got the resale prices they do. My post was just giving the opinion shared by many people, collectors, players and even other cue makers. Again I am sorry that you don't agree with this opinion, and you are entitled to your opinion, I can't argue that the cues play good or bad, it's personal preference. I can speak on the cue designs that I have seen and I did. I never said I don't like Phillippi cues, I just gave my opinion about why they have poor resale and why I wouldn't buy one. Also as far as who puts the most inlays in?? What does that have to do with anything? I know of many cue makers who put more inlays into cues, but inlays doesn't translate into GOOD in my eyes.

Jim
JimBo, he did not ask about cue designs. He stated that he was already aware of the resale issue. His last line was a fact and a question. Neither of which you addressed. This is not a pissing contest my friend. He stated that he is now playing with a Phillippi and loves it. His question was " How does his cuemaking compare to some of those mentioned." You sir took it as an opportunity to knock Phillippi cues. Then you went on and suggested that I have something to gain by defending Richard and Rick. I personally know many of the top notch cuemakers out there. I have seen some lousy work in my day. I would never go on a public forum and bash anyones product or try and tarnish their name and possibly have a negative effect on their income. I had one instance where someone made a false claim and I called him on it. I also stated that he made one of the best products out there. It was a minor issue.
Best Regards, Don Purdy
 
Donald A. Purdy said:
JimBo, he did not ask about cue designs. He stated that he was already aware of the resale issue. His last line was a fact and a question. Neither of which you addressed. This is not a pissing contest my friend. He stated that he is now playing with a Phillippi and loves it. His question was " How does his cuemaking compare to some of those mentioned." You sir took it as an opportunity to knock Phillippi cues. Then you went on and suggested that I have something to gain by defending Richard and Rick. I personally know many of the top notch cuemakers out there. I have seen some lousy work in my day. I would never go on a public forum and bash anyones product or try and tarnish their name and possibly have a negative effect on their income. I had one instance where someone made a false claim and I called him on it. I also stated that he made one of the best products out there. It was a minor issue.
Best Regards, Don Purdy
You're right it's not a pissing contest, the question was about their cuemaking, part of cuemaking is the design work. I have already said I will not comment on hit because it's meaningless, that leaves designs and construction. What I commented on was the design aspect. You claim to know many of the top cuemakers, why don't you call them up and ask what they think about Phillippi's cue designs, you might have to come back and give me a public apology. That is if you are friends with them as you claim because as you may or may not know most cue makers will not speak the truth to some stranger on the phone. If you have seen some lousy work from a cue maker and you don't have the balls to speak up about it in public that would seem to be your own personal problem. I on the other hand have seen thousands of cues and know many of these same cue makers you claim to know, I have no problem facing them in public because everything I say here I would back up in public and is IMO the truth. I would have no problem telling Phillippi that I think some of the designs they have done over the years are just a bit to close to some other top makers, and I am sure they would have a lot of trouble debating it. Again I am sorry you don't agree with my OPINION but it's mine and it's what I find to be the truth. I was responding to someone who asked for it, I gave my reasons why and I am sure many agree with me. Not having the balls to give your opinion when it's negative is IMO a character flaw and one I don't share. But I guess if all you want to do is be an ass kisser good luck. Again IMO that helps nobody.

JIM
 
elect jimbo captain of the cue design police! he can join drivermaker, who is the shot-making/aiming cop.
 
Well JimBo Bob Boy

Now you have called me a ball less ass kisser and made several negative comments about Phillippi cues. The mans question was about cue construction, playability and having a great name in the business. Not a word about inlays or inlay designs. You just wanted to bash Phillippi and now you wish to question and bash me. I could care less about your OPINION because that is just what it implies. You know what they say about OPINIONS, and you are one of those also. So just sit behind your keyboard and bash everybody you don't agree with. One of these days you will accidently run into someone you talked trash about in the real world. I would love to show ya what a ball less ass kisser would do to a punk ass like yourself. AMF my friend.
Don Purdy
 
When you ask the question, "Do these cues actually play better...?" that, imo, is difficult to answer because everyone has a different opinion on the playability of a cue. Take a rack of house cues with different tapers, weights, lengths, etc. and let 5 players check them out. Each player will have their own preferences. It is doubtful that all 5 players will choose the same cue.

What I look at the most in a cue is the workmanship. Slide your hand over the joint and the inlays. If I feel any rough edges, I'm not going to be impressed. Next I'm going to look at the finish. Does it dazzle me or does it look dull? After that, I'm going to check out the taper of the shaft, the length of the cue, how it fits in my hand, etc. The hit is extremely important as well but again I think that it is a personal thing and a cue that hits good for me won't necessarily be good for someone else.




Rick said:
Hi guys I keep reading how long the wait is for certain cuemakers like Hercek, mottey, southwest, bluegrass, Josswest, Shick, etc. Do these cues actually play better than cuemakers that take much less time or is it the fact that they have such a great name in the business that it is desirable to have and show one off. I know one reason is the resale value but to buy one usually costs more. I see on ebay that some rather plain looking sticks from these cuemakers sell for 2000 and up. I currently have a Phillippi cue that I love. How does his cuemaking compare to some of the ones I mentioned
 
larrynj1 said:
elect jimbo captain of the cue design police! he can join drivermaker, who is the shot-making/aiming cop.


And what are you in the whole scheme of things, the forum high priest of anal itching products?
 
Rickw said:
When you ask the question, "Do these cues actually play better...?" that, imo, is difficult to answer because everyone has a different opinion on the playability of a cue. Take a rack of house cues with different tapers, weights, lengths, etc. and let 5 players check them out. Each player will have their own preferences. It is doubtful that all 5 players will choose the same cue.

What I look at the most in a cue is the workmanship. Slide your hand over the joint and the inlays. If I feel any rough edges, I'm not going to be impressed. Next I'm going to look at the finish. Does it dazzle me or does it look dull? After that, I'm going to check out the taper of the shaft, the length of the cue, how it fits in my hand, etc. The hit is extremely important as well but again I think that it is a personal thing and a cue that hits good for me won't necessarily be good for someone else.

That is an excellent way to look at it Rick. If you find a cue you like, thats all that counts. It could be $200 or $ 200,000. Phillippi builds a cue just as good as anybody on the block. That is what you asked about in the first place.
Don Purdy
 
Donald A. Purdy said:
Now you have called me a ball less ass kisser and made several negative comments about Phillippi cues. The mans question was about cue construction, playability and having a great name in the business. Not a word about inlays or inlay designs. You just wanted to bash Phillippi and now you wish to question and bash me. I could care less about your OPINION because that is just what it implies. You know what they say about OPINIONS, and you are one of those also. So just sit behind your keyboard and bash everybody you don't agree with. One of these days you will accidently run into someone you talked trash about in the real world. I would love to show ya what a ball less ass kisser would do to a punk ass like yourself. AMF my friend.
Don Purdy
You were called exactly what you confessed to being; don't get mad at me if the truth hurts. By your own words you said you knew bad info about cuemakers yet wouldn't talk about it, that in my book makes you balless. If someone asks a question and you are afraid to give an honest reply about something you know to be fact it makes you balless. Sorry the truth hurts, I'm not looking at it as a negative comment or an insult it's just one thing about you and I that is different. I never asked you to care about my opinion, I wasn't giving it to you. The man asked about someone's cuemaking, I am not sure how you define the word, but to me it means beginning to end, that means Design-materials-workmanship-as well as how his work stands up and how he stands behind it. Hit is not part of that equation (again IMO). You claim I made bad comments about Phillippi cues, I disagree, but I am sure you can point some out to me other then the design thing. You also claim I am sitting behind my keyboard and Bash people I don't agree with, all I did was answer a question asked and gave MY OWN opinion, you seem to be the one who is disagreeing. Then you go on to threaten me, I find that funny. You don't like my opinion and then you threaten me. Well the difference is I'm not an anonymous screen name, 90% of the cue makers know who I am and I am very easy to find. I'll be at DCC and Valley Forge, you can ask anyone you'd like who JimBo is and I am sure they will point me out. Then we can walk over to Phillippi's booth I can point out what cues (if any) are very close to other cue makers designs and you can agree, disagree and then follow through on your internet threats if you like. I don't hold grudges and I don't beat people up over opinions I don't like (words on a computer screen). Have a nice day.

Jim
 
JimBo said:
You were called exactly what you confessed to being; don't get mad at me if the truth hurts. By your own words you said you knew bad info about cuemakers yet wouldn't talk about it, that in my book makes you balless. If someone asks a question and you are afraid to give an honest reply about something you know to be fact it makes you balless. Sorry the truth hurts, I'm not looking at it as a negative comment or an insult it's just one thing about you and I that is different. I never asked you to care about my opinion, I wasn't giving it to you. The man asked about someone's cuemaking, I am not sure how you define the word, but to me it means beginning to end, that means Design-materials-workmanship-as well as how his work stands up and how he stands behind it. Hit is not part of that equation (again IMO). You claim I made bad comments about Phillippi cues, I disagree, but I am sure you can point some out to me other then the design thing. You also claim I am sitting behind my keyboard and Bash people I don't agree with, all I did was answer a question asked and gave MY OWN opinion, you seem to be the one who is disagreeing. Then you go on to threaten me, I find that funny. You don't like my opinion and then you threaten me. Well the difference is I'm not an anonymous screen name, 90% of the cue makers know who I am and I am very easy to find. I'll be at DCC and Valley Forge, you can ask anyone you'd like who JimBo is and I am sure they will point me out. Then we can walk over to Phillippi's booth I can point out what cues (if any) are very close to other cue makers designs and you can agree, disagree and then follow through on your internet threats if you like. I don't hold grudges and I don't beat people up over opinions I don't like (words on a computer screen). Have a nice day.

Jim

In my OPINION JimBo Bob Boy, you ain't worth another word.
AMF
 
Donald A. Purdy said:
In my OPINION JimBo Bob Boy, you ain't worth another word.
AMF

I'm glad you finally came around to my way of thinking. :-D
AMF
Jim
 
Phillippi cues.

JimBo's comments about Phillippi cues are the same as any cue dealer I have talked to in the past. That's why their resale value is low. IMO, he is stating what the majority of people think of Phillippi cues.
 
larrynj1 said:
elect jimbo captain of the cue design police!



I think that gerbil that's running around in your butt might have made it's way to your brain....that makes sense...they're located in the same place. LMAO

I'll put up $10k in a debate between you and Jimbo on both of your knowledge regarding cues. You can ask your own questions to each other or someone from the outside will. This should be a riot....like a guy with a couple of PhD.'s debating a 3rd grader.........LOL
 
driverhamster, you are full of crap and a windbag. as i said above, you need help with this obsession you have with my ass.
 
larrynj1 said:
driverhamster, you are full of crap and a windbag. as i said above, you need help with this obsession you have with my ass.


Gerbilman...let me say it one more time...I WILL POST $10k to have YOU and Jimbo debate pool cues. I'll have to clear it with Jimbo, but I think he'll gladly take half of your $10 grand in a split. I am NOT Bullshitting!! I know Jimbo's knowledge of pool cues, what I know about you is that you ARE an ASS, and I'm surely not obsessed with it. YOU are with what you think is funny by always scrawling in..."my ass itches...scratch scratch". What a class act...pony up big mouth!
 
where exactly are we going to "post" the cash? let's here some specifics about your little fantasy, dm. try to leave my ass out of it please. LMAO!!

do i then get to offer you MY proposition for the amount of cash i specify?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top