Do you use an aiming system or go by feel?

[ENGLISH!]

Deliver all the blows that you can! You have ZERO chance of stopping the CTE phenomenon from spreading and spreading and spreading around the world. And when my book is released your ZERO chance is going to go to the negative side.
You are looking at a complete impossibility.

Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to advance CTE.....

Stan Shuffett

Well, since it is VERY OBVIOUS that you are here in a discussion forum with NO intention to discuss anything actually related regarding the subject & only want to make 'blanket' 'marketing' statements, Until you are willing to discuss, I would suggest that EVERYONE ignore you.

Best Wishes.

 

[Patrick Johnson]

Perhaps with CTE, I can find feel via objectivity or objectivity via feel.

Perhaps... if words didn't mean anything.

That'd be pretty special wouldn't it?

I think that's the right word.

pj
chgo

 

[stan shuffett]

Well, since it is VERY OBVIOUS that you are here in a discussion forum with NO intention to discuss anything actually related regarding the subject & only want to make 'blanket' 'marketing' statements, I would suggest that EVERYONE ignore you.

Best Wishes.

There is a tremendous amount of real professional information in my posts this morning.

The search for how to really play the game can be found just beside CCB. It took me more than 50 years to learn that because no one knew how to advance it in the right way.

Well, contrary to what you think, I am unloading some real jewels here and I will never stop unloading CTE on the world.......it would be way to selfish to keep what I have come to know for myself.

Stan Shuffett

 

[ENGLISH!]

Perhaps with CTE, I can find feel via objectivity or objectivity via feel. That'd be pretty special wouldn't it? Perhaps at cte's highest level there is a merging of the two.

Stan Shuffett

Ahhhh....

Don't let John Barton hear you say that.

Every method does that in some form or another.

Is CTE perhaps better in that regard, at least for some? Quite possibly so & that is what PJ, others, & I have been saying ALL along.

But that concept has been vehemently 'attacked'.

Is a meeting of minds possible here?

Best Wishes.

 

[stan shuffett]

Perhaps... if words didn't mean anything.


I think that's the right word.

pj
chgo

Shhhhhhhhhh......just beside center cue ball. . sshhhhhhhhhh. It won't hurt...

Stan Shuffett

 

[stan shuffett]

Ahhhh....

Don't let John Barton hear you say that.

Every method does that in some form or another.

Is CTE perhaps better in that regard, at least for some? Quite possibly so & that is what PJ, others, & I have been saying ALL along.

But that concept has been vehemently 'attacked'.

Is a meeting of minds possible here?

Best Wishes.

Chapter 20....... CTE at the pro level is stronger than a race horse.

Stan Shuffett

 

[cookie man]

I meant no harm. Manipulation isn't a bad word really as it denotes changes. What word would you have preferred?

First off you have A,B and C. Nothing else had to be said. I took manipulation as meaning we needed more than that and we don't.

 

[ENGLISH!]

There is a tremendous amount of real professional information in my posts this morning.

The search for how to really play the game can be found just beside CCB. It took me more than 50 years to learn that because no one knew how to advance it in the right way.

Well, contrary to what you think, I am unloading some real jewels here and I will never stop unloading CTE on the world.......it would be way to selfish to keep what I have come to know for myself.

Stan Shuffett

Good Posts & I might agree but why avoid what has come before & led you to where you are now?

I asked a simple question after your suggestion of an angled cue, yet you took an end run & avoided it. Why?

If it is a work in process & you don't know what defined angle it is relative to what, why not just say so. You say you want ro give, then why not give?

How about some plain old simple honesty instead of what appears to be 'cloak & dagger'?

Why are you here today?

That's a simple question.

Best Wishes.

 

[cookie man]

Your first statement here (that put in blue) is merely your opinion. It is one that logical, rational, critical thinking along with some rather simple science would indicate to be incorrect. MIC DROP. SLAM DUNK. TAKE IT TO THE BANK.

How can this be when you say it hasn't been proven or un-proven?
Tell me the simple scientific theory you have and show the tests that prove it.
Oh, that's right it's un-proven. Are you ever going to make any sense.

 

[cookie man]

"The real math" didn't have to "emerge"; it has existed since long before any of us were born - this ain't rocket surgery.

It shows that "the perceptual phenomenon of CTE" is feel.

pj <- not that there's anything wrong with that
chgo

How does math show feel exactly. I hooked a lot of classes. Enlighten me.

 

[ENGLISH!]

Chapter 20....... CTE at the pro level is stronger than a race horse.

Stan Shuffett

Sir,

In a horse race only one wins. Some race horses are strong, some very strong, & some rather weak 'relatively' speaking.

At a 'pro level' they are ALL like thoroughbreds, some strong, some not so strong, 'relatively' speaking.

Again, more cloak & dagger 'marketing' or enticement through assertions?

Best Wishes.

 

[cookie man]

Well, since it is VERY OBVIOUS that you are here in a discussion forum with NO intention to discuss anything actually related regarding the subject & only want to make 'blanket' 'marketing' statements, I would suggest that EVERYONE ignore you.

Best Wishes.

This is strictly intended for the tens of thousands of English's followers, everyone else can just laugh and shake your heads.

 

[cookie man]

Sir,

In a horse race only one wins. Some race horses are strong, some very strong, & some rather weak 'relatively' speaking.

At a 'pro level' they are ALL like thoroughbreds, some strong, some not so strong, 'relatively' speaking.

Again, more cloak & dagger 'marketing' or enticement through assertions?

Best Wishes.

Win, place, show, exacta. It's all money in the bank

 

[stan shuffett]

Good Posts & I might agree but why avoid what has come before & led you to where you are now?

I asked a simple question after your suggestion of an angled cue, yet you took an end run & avoided it. Why?

If it is a work in process & you don't know what defined angle it is relative to what, why not just say so. You say you want ro give, then why not give?

How about some plain old simple honesty instead of what appears to be 'cloak & dagger'?

Why are you here today?

That's a simple question.

Best Wishes.

Nothing has changed!

The visuals and the foundational 1/2 tip pivot have remained constant. I have spent the past 5 years studying the visual nature of CTE from full stance to final aim within the context of the visuals and the pivot.

My goal has always been to understand everything related to that initial framework. There are lots of ways to close that 1/2 tip gap. I Know the optimal way to close the gap and all that is involved visually and physically and that does NOT mean that the system has changed.

It just means that I worked the fire out of it......to understand every detail that is humanly possible for this mind.

Stan Shuffett

 

[cookie man]

Good Posts & I might agree but why avoid what has come before & led you to where you are now?

I asked a simple question after your suggestion of an angled cue, yet you took an end run & avoided it. Why?

If it is a work in process & you don't know what defined angle it is relative to what, why not just say so. You say you want ro give, then why not give?

How about some plain old simple honesty instead of what appears to be 'cloak & dagger'?

Why are you here today?

That's a simple question.

Best Wishes.

If you were a user you wouldn't ask that question. Try learning a little before discussing and acting like a know it all.

 

[cookie man]

Nothing has changed!

The visuals and the foundational 1/2 tip pivot have remained constant. I have spent the past 5 years studying the visual nature of CTE from full stance to final aim within the context of the visuals and the pivot.

My goal has always been to understand everything related to that initial framework. There are lots of ways to close that 1/2 tip gap. I Know the optimal way to close the gap and all that is involved visually and physically and that does mean that the system has changed.

It just means that I worked the fire out of it......to understand every detail that is humanly possible for this mind.

Stan Shuffett

And for that hard work, we thank you.

 

[ENGLISH!]

How can this be when you say it hasn't been proven or un-proven?
Tell me the simple scientific theory you have and show the tests that prove it.
Oh, that's right it's un-proven. Are you ever going to make any sense.

What part of 'indicate' do you not understand?

It suggests, but is not proof.

In the realm of abstracts there really is no proof until the party understands the reasoning.

There is no bullet from the body that fits the gun of the owner that was the only person in the room with the gun & powder burns on their hand & with the victim both before & after the murder victim died, hence the gun owner is the murderer.

Best Wishes.

PS What is sense to others may not be sense to you...
& vise versa.

 

[cookie man]

What part of 'indicate' do you not understand?

It suggests, but is not proof.

In the realm of abstracts there really is no proof until the party understands the reasoning.

There is no bullet from the body that fits the gun of the owner that was the only person in the room with the gun & the body both before & after the murder victim died, hence the gun owner is the murderer.

Best Wishes.

PS What is sense to others may not be sense to you...
& vise versa.

And the simple scientific theory is.........................

 

[ENGLISH!]

Nothing has changed!

The visuals and the foundational 1/2 tip pivot have remained constant. I have spent the past 5 years studying the visual nature of CTE from full stance to final aim within the context of the visuals and the pivot.

My goal has always been to understand everything related to that initial framework. There are lots of ways to close that 1/2 tip gap. I Know the optimal way to close the gap and all that is involved visually and physically and that does NOT mean that the system has changed.

It just means that I worked the fire out of it......to understand every detail that is humanly possible for this mind.

Stan Shuffett

It sounds a bit like what Gene Albrecth knows more than a bit about.

That is a good clarifying statement yet with no specifics.

Given my offset vision & parallel english for 'all' of my playing time, I actually had a bit of trouble with CJ's TOI at first & he implied that I was NOT shifting parallel, which I assured him that I was, since I had been playing with 'parallel' english for more than 45 years. He then PMd with a tip that made the difference because the TOI is so slight compared to the amounts of english that I had been mostly using.

So... please believe me when I say that I know a bit about a slightly angled cue.

I would be willing to hazard a guess that you know much about it, even if the applications may be different in some way.

Best Wishes.

 

[ENGLISH!]

And the simple scientific theory is.........................

Of what scientific theory are you referring?